[Gluster-devel] Spurious regression failure? tests/basic/ec/ec-background-heals.t
Ashish Pandey
aspandey at redhat.com
Thu Jan 26 14:15:27 UTC 2017
Xavi,
shd has been disabled in this test on line number 12 and we have also disabled client side heal.
So, no body is going to try to heal it.
Ashish
----- Original Message -----
From: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukherj at redhat.com>
To: "Ashish Pandey" <aspandey at redhat.com>, "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowdapp at redhat.com>, "Xavier Hernandez" <xhernandez at datalab.es>
Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 5:50:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Spurious regression failure? tests/basic/ec/ec-background-heals.t
I've +1ed it now.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 at 15:05, Xavier Hernandez < xhernandez at datalab.es > wrote:
Hi Atin,
I don't clearly see what's the problem. Even if the truncate causes a
dirty flag to be set, eventually it should be removed before the
$HEAL_TIMEOUT value.
For now I've marked the test as bad.
Patch is: https://review.gluster.org/16470
Xavi
On 25/01/17 17:24, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> Can we please address this as early as possible, my patch has hit this
> failure 3 out of 4 recheck attempts now. I'm guessing some recent
> changes has caused it.
>
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 at 12:10, Ashish Pandey < aspandey at redhat.com
> <mailto: aspandey at redhat.com >> wrote:
>
>
> Pranith,
>
> In this test tests/basic/ec/ec-background-heals.t, I think the line
> number 86 actually creating a heal entry instead of
> helping data heal quickly. What if all the data was already healed
> at that moment, truncate came and in preop set the dirty flag and at the
> end, as part of the heal, dirty flag was unset on previous good
> bricks only and the brick which acted as heal-sink still has dirty
> marked by truncate.
> That is why we are only seeing "1" as get_pending_heal_count. If a
> file was actually not healed it should be "2".
> If heal on this file completes and unset of dirty flag happens
> before truncate everything will be fine.
>
> I think we can wait for file to be heal without truncate?
>
> 71 #Test that disabling background-heals still drains the queue
> 72 TEST $CLI volume set $V0 disperse.background-heals 1
> 73 TEST touch $M0/{a,b,c,d}
> 74 TEST kill_brick $V0 $H0 $B0/${V0}2
> 75 EXPECT_WITHIN $CONFIG_UPDATE_TIMEOUT "1" mount_get_option_value
> $M0 $V0-disperse-0 background-heals
> 76 EXPECT_WITHIN $CONFIG_UPDATE_TIMEOUT "200"
> mount_get_option_value $M0 $V0-disperse-0 heal-wait-qlength
> 77 TEST truncate -s 1GB $M0/a
> 78 echo abc > $M0/b
> 79 echo abc > $M0/c
> 80 echo abc > $M0/d
> 81 TEST $CLI volume start $V0 force
> 82 EXPECT_WITHIN $CHILD_UP_TIMEOUT "3" ec_child_up_count $V0 0
> 83 TEST chown root:root $M0/{a,b,c,d}
> 84 TEST $CLI volume set $V0 disperse.background-heals 0
> 85 EXPECT_NOT "0" mount_get_option_value $M0 $V0-disperse-0
> heal-waiters
>
> 86 TEST truncate -s 0 $M0/a # This completes the heal fast ;-) <<<<<<<
>
> 87 EXPECT_WITHIN $HEAL_TIMEOUT "^0$" get_pending_heal_count $V0
>
> ----
> Ashish
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From: *"Raghavendra Gowdappa" < rgowdapp at redhat.com
> <mailto: rgowdapp at redhat.com >>
> *To: *"Nithya Balachandran" < nbalacha at redhat.com
> <mailto: nbalacha at redhat.com >>
> *Cc: *"Gluster Devel" < gluster-devel at gluster.org
> <mailto: gluster-devel at gluster.org >>, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> < pkarampu at redhat.com <mailto: pkarampu at redhat.com >>, "Ashish Pandey"
> < aspandey at redhat.com <mailto: aspandey at redhat.com >>
> *Sent: *Wednesday, January 25, 2017 9:41:38 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [Gluster-devel] Spurious regression
> failure? tests/basic/ec/ec-background-heals.t
>
>
> Found another failure on same test:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/2874/consoleFull
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Nithya Balachandran" < nbalacha at redhat.com
> <mailto: nbalacha at redhat.com >>
> > To: "Gluster Devel" < gluster-devel at gluster.org
> <mailto: gluster-devel at gluster.org >>, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> < pkarampu at redhat.com <mailto: pkarampu at redhat.com >>, "Ashish Pandey"
> > < aspandey at redhat.com <mailto: aspandey at redhat.com >>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 9:16:31 AM
> > Subject: [Gluster-devel] Spurious regression
> failure? tests/basic/ec/ec-background-heals.t
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Can you please take a look at
> > https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/2859/console ?
> >
> > tests/basic/ec/ec-background-heals.t has failed.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nithya
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto: Gluster-devel at gluster.org >
> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> _______________________________________________
>
> Gluster-devel mailing list
>
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto: Gluster-devel at gluster.org >
>
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
> --
> - Atin (atinm)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
--
- Atin (atinm)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170126/68965406/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list