[Gluster-devel] ./tests/bitrot/bug-1373520.t failure on master

[Atin Mukherjee]

Can this patch be reverted asap as it has blocked other patches to get in?
IMO, we shouldn't be marking the test as bad given we know the patch which
introduced the regression.

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote:

> https://review.gluster.org/16462 has caused this regression as per the
> git bisect.
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
> pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> This is being tracked @ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
>> ow_bug.cgi?id=1427404, krutika posted a patch to move it to bad tests
>> until we find why a lookup on one file is leading to lookup on the hardlink
>> instead.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Susant Palai <spalai at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>    test case: ./tests/bitrot/bug-1373520.t is seen to be failing on
>>> different regression runs on master.
>>> Requesting to look in to it.
>>>
>>> Few instances:
>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/netbsd7-regression/3118/consoleFull
>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/3451/
>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/netbsd7-regression/3122/consoleFull
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Susant
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pranith
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ~ Atin (atinm)
>



-- 

~ Atin (atinm)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170228/b30a850f/attachment.html>