[Gluster-devel] IMP: Release 3.10: RC1 Pending bugs (Need fixes by 21st Feb)

Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkarampu at redhat.com
Mon Feb 20 16:29:30 UTC 2017


On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Shyam <srangana at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> RC1 tagging is *tentatively* scheduled for 21st Feb, 2017
>>
>> The intention is that RC1 becomes the release, hence we would like to
>> chase down all blocker bugs [1] and get them fixed before RC1 is tagged.
>>
>> This mail requests information on the various bugs and to understand if
>> it is possible to get them fixed done by the 21st.
>>
>> Bugs pending for RC1 tagging:
>>   1) Bug 1415226 - packaging: python/python2(/python3) cleanup
>>     - Status: Review awaiting verification and a backport
>>     - master bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414902
>>       - Review: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16649/
>>     - *Niels*, I was not able verify this over the weekend, there is a
>> *chance* I can do this tomorrow. Do you have alternate plans to get this
>> verified?
>>
>>   2) Bug 1421590 - Bricks take up new ports upon volume restart after
>> add-brick op with brick mux enabled
>>     - Status: *Atin/Samikshan/Jeff*, any update on this?
>>       - Can we document this as a known issue? What would be the way to
>> get volume to use the older ports (a glusterd restart?)?
>>
>>   3) Bug 1421956 - Disperse: Fallback to pre-compiled code execution when
>> dynamic code generation fails
>>     - Status: Awaiting review closure
>>     - *Pranith/Ashish*, request one of you to close the review on this
>> one, so that Xavi can backport this to 3.10
>>     - master bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421955
>>       - Review: https://review.gluster.org/16614
>>
>>   4) Bug 1422769 - brick process crashes when glusterd is restarted
>>     - Status: As per comment #6, the test case that Jeff developed for
>> this is not reporting a crash
>>     - *Atin*, should we defer this form the blocker list for 3.10? Can
>> you take a look at the test case as well?
>>       - Tet case: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16651/
>>
>>   5) Bug 1422781 - Transport endpoint not connected error seen on client
>> when glusterd is restarted
>>     - Status: Repro not clean across setups, still debugging the problem
>>     - *Atin*, we may need someone from your team to take this up and
>> narrow this down to a fix or determine if this is really a blocker
>>
>>   6) Bug 1423385 - Crash in index xlator because of race in inode_ctx_set
>> and inode_ref
>>     - Status: Review posted for master, awaiting review closure
>>       - *Du/Pranith*, please close the review of the above
>>     - Review: https://review.gluster.org/16622
>>     - master bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423373
>>     - Related note: I was facing the same crash on the client stack as
>> mentioned in bug #1423065, cherry picking this fix and rerunning my tests
>> does not reproduce the crash (as was suggested by Ravi and Poornima).
>>
>
> Merged this in the morning. Spending time on 3) above, hope to close it
> soon.
>

3) is taking more time than expected. Will complete it tomorrow IST.

>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shyam
>>
>> [1] 3.10 tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
>> ow_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.10.0
>>
>> [2] Dynamic tracker list: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
>> owdependencytree.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.10.0&maxdepth=1&hide_resolved=1
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Pranith
>



-- 
Pranith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170220/6a6f63c1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list