[Gluster-devel] 3.10 release and testing improvements

Raghavendra Talur rtalur at redhat.com
Fri Feb 3 07:12:39 UTC 2017


On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Nithya Balachandran
<nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2 February 2017 at 09:26, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1 February 2017 at 19:27, Raghavendra Talur <rtalur at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> As we approach release of 3.10, we should take a look at existing
>>> tests are being skipped because of issues. These two weeks should be
>>> right time for us to focus on tests as feature patches have been
>>> merged and is on pause. I have made a list of components and known bad
>>> tests against them[1]. You can also find the list of tests [2].
>>>
>>> I have filed only one issue in github[3] and that is the only blocker
>>> from testing perspective for this release.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Raghavendra Talur
>>>
>>> [1] Components and bad tests against them
>>> <------------------------------------->
>>> afr 1
>>> ec 1
>>> gfapi 2
>>> tier 7
>>> dht 1
>>> ec 1
>>> fuse 1
>>> glusterd 1
>>> quota 1
>>> snapshot 1
>>> stripe 2
>>> georep 2
>>> write-behind 1
>>> <------------------------------------->
>>>
>>> [2] List of skipped tests
>>> <----------List of skipped tests----------------------->
>>> tests/basic/afr/tarissue.t
>>> tests/basic/ec/ec-background-heals.t
>>> tests/basic/gfapi/bug1291259.t
>>> tests/basic/tier/bug-1214222-directories_missing_after_attach_tier.t
>>> tests/basic/tier/fops-during-migration.t
>>> tests/basic/tier/record-metadata-heat.t
>>> tests/basic/tier/tier-file-create.t
>>> tests/basic/tier/tier_lookup_heal.t
>>> tests/basic/tier/tier-snapshot.t
>>> tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1066798.t
>>
>>
>> This should work once https://review.gluster.org/16457 is merged. I will
>> remove this test post that.
>>
> The test passes consistently on my system with the latest master (and
> without this patch). Can we try running it on a regression setup to see if
> it works there?
>
> What is the best way to proceed here?

Now we don't have access to regression setups anymore. Way to go
forward is to delete the G_TESTDEF line in the test and send that as a
patch.

>
>> Thanks,
>> Nithya
>>
>>
>>>
>>> tests/bugs/ec/bug-1304988.t
>>> tests/bugs/fuse/bug-924726.t
>>> tests/bugs/gfapi/bug-1093594.t
>>> tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-1238706-daemons-stop-on-peer-cleanup.t
>>> tests/bugs/quota/bug-1235182.t
>>>
>>> tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1140162-file-snapshot-features-encrypt-opts-validation.t
>>> tests/bugs/stripe/bug-1002207.t
>>> tests/bugs/stripe/bug-1111454.t
>>> tests/bugs/tier/bug-1286974.t
>>> tests/bugs/write-behind/bug-1279730.t
>>> tests/geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t
>>> tests/geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-tarssh.t
>>> <------------------------------------->
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/86
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>>
>


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list