[Gluster-devel] Release 3.12: Glusto run status

[Shwetha Panduranga]

I have sent a patch to fix this issue last week:
https://review.gluster.org/18099

I will send another patch to move all the hard coded timeouts to make it
configurable.

-Shwetha


On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Nigel Babu <nigelb at redhat.com> wrote:

> Shwetha,
>
> Is this time out configurable? Or is it hard-coded into the glusto-tests
> repo?
>
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 1:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Nigel was kind enough to kick off a glusto run on 3.12 head a couple of
>> days back. The status can be seen here [1].
>>
>> The run failed, but managed to get past what Glusto does on master (see
>> [2]). Not that this is a consolation, but just stating the fact.
>>
>> The run [1] failed at,
>> 17:05:57 functional/bvt/test_cvt.py::TestGlusterHealSanity_dispersed_
>> glusterfs::test_self_heal_when_io_in_progress FAILED
>>
>> The test case failed due to,
>> 17:10:28 E       AssertionError: ('Volume %s : All process are not
>> online', 'testvol_dispersed')
>>
>> The test case can be seen here [3], and the reason for failure is that
>> Glusto did not wait long enough for the down brick to come up (it waited
>> for 10 seconds, but the brick came up after 12 seconds or within the same
>> second as the test for it being up. The log snippets pointing to this
>> problem are here [4]. In short there was no real bug or issue that caused
>> the failure as yet.
>>
>> Glusto as a gating factor for this release was desirable, but having got
>> this far on 3.12 does help.
>>
>> @nigel, we could try post increasing the timeout between bringing the
>> brick up to checking if it is up, and try another run, let me know if that
>> works, and what is needed from me to get this going.
>>
>> Shyam
>>
>> [1] Glusto 3.12 run: https://ci.centos.org/view/Glu
>> ster/job/gluster_glusto/365/
>>
>> [2] Glusto on master: https://ci.centos.org/view/Glu
>> ster/job/gluster_glusto/360/testReport/functional.bvt.test_cvt/
>>
>> [3] Failed test case: https://ci.centos.org/view/Glu
>> ster/job/gluster_glusto/365/testReport/functional.bvt.test_
>> cvt/TestGlusterHealSanity_dispersed_glusterfs/test_self_heal
>> _when_io_in_progress/
>>
>> [4] Log analysis pointing to the failed check:
>> https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/znTPiFLrc2~vsWuoYRToZA
>>
>> "Releases are made better together"
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> nigelb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170828/b81dff73/attachment.html>