[Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository

Prashanth Pai ppai at redhat.com
Thu May 19 13:03:53 UTC 2016


Hi,

glusterdocs repo[1] has been cleaned of presentation files.
Contributors please discard your existing forks and clones.
Repo description on github has been updated to indicate the same.

[1]: https://github.com/gluster/glusterdocs

Regards,
 -Prashanth Pai

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Prashanth Pai" <ppai at redhat.com>
> To: "Amye Scavarda" <amye at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>, "Humble Chirammal" <hchiramm at redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 12:35:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Amye Scavarda" <amye at redhat.com>
> > To: "Kaushal M" <kshlmster at gmail.com>, "Prashanth Pai" <ppai at redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Raghavendra Talur" <rtalur at redhat.com>, "Gluster Devel"
> > <gluster-devel at gluster.org>, "Humble Chirammal"
> > <hchiramm at redhat.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 12:31:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git
> > repository
> > 
> > Prashanth,
> > Is this something you can take on?
> 
> Will do. Now that we have consensus.
> 
> > Thanks!
> > - amye
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Kaushal M <kshlmster at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > As the majority seem to favour Prashanth's approach, I vote for it as
> > > well.
> > >
> > > Just to make it clearer for all users, please add a **highlighted**
> > > note in the README that informs any visitor to the github page of the
> > > change.
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Raghavendra Talur <rtalur at redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Aravinda <avishwan at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> +1 for Prashanth's approach.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >>
> > > >> regards
> > > >> Aravinda
> > > >>
> > > >> On 05/18/2016 03:55 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal
> > > >> <humble.devassy at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye at redhat.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> All in favor of the 'everyone working on this should clone again'
> > > >> approach.
> > > >>
> > > >> Both approaches require cloning again, so which on are we voting for?
> > > >>
> > > >> 1. Prashanth's approach
> > > >>     - modify existing repo
> > > >>     - users re clone
> > > >>     - push force to their forks on github
> > > >>
> > > >> 2. Misc's approach
> > > >>   - create a new minified repo
> > > >>   - users clone/fork the new repo
> > > >>
> > > >> I don't mind either.
> > > >>
> > > >> +2 on the same thought. :)
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> Gluster-devel mailing list
> > > >> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> > > >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> Gluster-devel mailing list
> > > >> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> > > >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> Gluster-devel mailing list
> > > >> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> > > >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > > Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Amye Scavarda | amye at redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list