[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release Management Process change - proposal

[Kaushal M]

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Amye Scavarda <amye at redhat.com> wrote:
> So, as I review this, we have a few different guidelines for maintainers and
> release processes.
> We have ReadtheDocs [1], the old Community site [2] and the RTD
> documentation for releases [3]  -- while 1 and 2 look nearly identical, 2
> will eventually disappear so that we're not maintaining two active copies.
> Should we be consolidating these new guidelines into a new page in RTD?
>

These are essentially 2 different topics, and should remain so.

Guildelines for Maintainers should be describing a maintainers
responsibilities to the project and the community.
GlusterFS Release process describes how a release manager/maintainer
would perform a GlusterFS release.

But we're hoping to improve the release process to make component
maintainers a part of it.
If we get more agreement, helping out with the release will become a
maintainer responsibility and will be added to the maintainer
guidelines.
How the maintainers would help out with the process will be added to
the release process.


> - amye
>
> [1]
> https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Contributors-Guide/Guidelines-For-Maintainers/
> [2]
> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Guidelines_For_Maintainers
> [3]
> https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Contributors-Guide/GlusterFS-Release-process/
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 3:13 AM, FNU Raghavendra Manjunath
> <rabhat at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Kaushal M <kshlmster at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi All,
>>> >
>>> > We are blocked on 3.7.12 owing to this proposal. Appreciate any
>>> > feedback on this!
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Vijay
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Hi All,
>>> >>
>>> >> We have encountered a spate of regressions in recent 3.7.x releases.
>>> >> The
>>> >> 3.7.x maintainers are facing additional burdens to ensure functional,
>>> >> performance and upgrade correctness. I feel component maintainers
>>> >> should own
>>> >> these aspects of stability as we own the components and understand our
>>> >> components better than anybody else. In order to have more active
>>> >> participation from maintainers for every release going forward, I
>>> >> propose
>>> >> this process:
>>> >>
>>> >> 1. All component maintainers will need to provide an explicit ack
>>> >> about the
>>> >> content and quality of their respective components before a release is
>>> >> tagged.
>>> >>
>>> >> 2. A release will not be tagged if any component is not acked by a
>>> >> maintainer.
>>> >>
>>> >> 3. Release managers will co-ordinate getting acks from maintainers and
>>> >> perform necessary housekeeping (closing bugs etc.).
>>> >>
>>> >> This is not entirely new and a part of this process has been outlined
>>> >> in the
>>> >> Guidelines for Maintainers [1] document. I am inclined to enforce this
>>> >> process with more vigor to ensure that we do better on quality &
>>> >> stability.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thoughts, questions and feedback about the process are very welcome!
>>> >>
>>>
>>> +1 from me. Spreading out the verification duties will help us do
>>> better releases.
>>>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Vijay
>>> >>
>>> >> [1]
>>> >>
>>> >> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Guidelines_For_Maintainers
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > maintainers mailing list
>>> > maintainers at gluster.org
>>> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> maintainers mailing list
>> maintainers at gluster.org
>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Amye Scavarda | amye at redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead