[Gluster-devel] GF_PARENT_DOWN on SIGKILL

Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkarampu at redhat.com
Fri Jul 22 13:07:17 UTC 2016


It is only calling fini() apart from that not much.

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:

> Gah! sorry sorry, I meant to send the mail as SIGTERM. Not SIGKILL. So
> xavi and I were wondering why cleanup_and_exit() is not sending
> GF_PARENT_DOWN event.
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Jeff Darcy <jdarcy at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> > Does anyone know why GF_PARENT_DOWN is not triggered on SIGKILL? It
>> will give
>> > a chance for xlators to do any cleanup they need to do. For example ec
>> can
>> > complete the delayed xattrops.
>>
>> Nothing is triggered on SIGKILL.  SIGKILL is explicitly defined to
>> terminate a
>> process *immediately*.  Among other things, this means it can not be
>> ignored or
>> caught, to preclude handlers doing something that might delay termination.
>>
>>
>> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/V2_chap02.html#tag_15_04
>>
>> Since at least 4.2BSD and SVr2 (the first version of UNIX that I worked
>> on)
>> there have even been distinct kernel code paths to ensure special
>> handling of
>> SIGKILL.  There's nothing we can do about SIGKILL except be prepared to
>> deal
>> with it the same way we'd deal with the entire machine crashing.
>>
>> If you mean why is there nothing we can do on a *server* in response to
>> SIGKILL on a *client*, that's a slightly more interesting question.  It's
>> possible that the unique nature of SIGKILL puts connections into a
>> different state than either system failure (on the more abrupt side) or
>> clean shutdown (less abrupt).  If so, we probably need to take a look at
>> the socket/RPC code or perhaps even protocol/server to see why these
>> connections are not being cleaned up and shut down in a timely fashion.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Pranith
>



-- 
Pranith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20160722/bcdabdc8/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list