[Gluster-devel] NetBSD tests not running to completion.

[Emmanuel Dreyfus]

Jeff Darcy <jdarcy at redhat.com> wrote:

> Good idea.  Once per merge is still less than one per submission (what
> we have today), and better than nightly/weekly when it comes to
> identifying the source of a regression.  Seems like a good compromise.

Now what is the policy on post-merge regression failure?  What happens
if oiginal submitter is now willing to investigate?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu at netbsd.org