[Gluster-devel] NetBSD tests not running to completion.
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu at netbsd.org
Thu Jan 7 13:19:25 UTC 2016
Jeff Darcy <jdarcy at redhat.com> wrote:
> I'd prefer a "defined level of effort" approach which *might* reduce the
> benefit we derive from NetBSD testing but *definitely* keeps the cost
> under control.
Did we identify the worst offenders within the spurious failing tests?
We could ignore their output on NetBSD (this is how I started).
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu at netbsd.org
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list