[Gluster-devel] Ability to skip regression jobs?
Jeff Darcy
jdarcy at redhat.com
Tue Dec 20 18:10:21 UTC 2016
> One way to reduce load is to figure out a way to award +1s to parent
> patches when a dependent patch passes regression. It is recommended
> that a change be split into as many smaller sets as possible.
> Currently, if we send 4 patches that need to be serially merged, all 4
> have to pass regressions. Instead, if Jenkins offered a way to block
> merging of subset of patches and made it possible to take all 4 in in
> one go, we could run tests only on top of these patches. The last time
> I checked, such a feature did not exist in Jenkins.
How hard would it be to make it so that regression votes for a patch
at the top of the stack get propagated to all as-yet-unmerged ancestors,
or at least those without votes of their own? With that little piece,
I think the rest could be handled as a matter of process/convention.
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list