[Gluster-devel] Regarding a consistent gfapi .t failure

[Anoop C S]

On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 04:10 -0500, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote:
> 
> Oh ok. I see that in ./tests/basic/gfapi/bug1291259.c the function glfs_upcall_get_reason() is
> causing segmentation fault, as per the stderr messages.

Another recent failure in master branch:
https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/2168/console

> Adding Niels, if he wants to take a look at this.
> 
> We can mark the test bad by raising a Bz i suppose.
> 
> Thanks,
> Poornima
> 
> From: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com>
> To: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" <pgurusid at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Soumya Koduri" <skoduri at redhat.com>, "Pranith Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 1:49:27 AM
> Subject: Re: Regarding a consistent gfapi .t failure
> 
> No unfortunately I had no success with recreating the failure either on my setup or on a borrowed
> centos from jenkins cluster.
> 
> Ok this is good information. I didn't know it had failed on other patches too. I thought it's only
> with my patch.
> Can this be marked as a bad test in that case?
> 
> -Krutika
> 
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah <pgurusid at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Are you able consistently reproduce this on your local system as well? If so can you share the
> > system?
> > I see that it has failed for many other patches as well. http://fstat.gluster.org/weeks/1/failur
> > e/34
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Poornima
> > From: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com>
> > To: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" <pgurusid at redhat.com>, "Soumya Koduri" <skoduri at redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Pranith Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 8:47:57 AM
> > Subject: Regarding a consistent gfapi .t failure
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The test tests/basic/gfapi/bug1291259.t seems to be failing consistently on my 3.9 backport http
> > ://review.gluster.org/#/c/16046/
> > 
> > The patch itself makes changes only in compound fops, so it is unlikely that the failure is
> > caused by the patch itself.
> > 
> > Here's a sample failure run: https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/2134/console
> > 
> > I ran the test on my laptop and it passes consistently.
> > I ran the test on a borrowed centos slave and it passes there as well.
> > I looked at the logfile bug1291259.log from the archived build failure logs
> > but there are no failures.
> > 
> > If you have any ideas on how to proceed further, could you please suggest the same?
> > 
> > -Krutika
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel