[Gluster-devel] Regarding a consistent gfapi .t failure

[Poornima Gurusiddaiah]

Oh ok. I see that in ./tests/basic/gfapi/bug1291259.c the function glfs_upcall_get_reason() is causing segmentation fault, as per the stderr messages. 
Adding Niels, if he wants to take a look at this. 

We can mark the test bad by raising a Bz i suppose. 

Thanks, 
Poornima 

----- Original Message -----

> From: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com>
> To: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" <pgurusid at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Soumya Koduri" <skoduri at redhat.com>, "Pranith Karampuri"
> <pkarampu at redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 1:49:27 AM
> Subject: Re: Regarding a consistent gfapi .t failure

> No unfortunately I had no success with recreating the failure either on my
> setup or on a borrowed centos from jenkins cluster.

> Ok this is good information. I didn't know it had failed on other patches
> too. I thought it's only with my patch.
> Can this be marked as a bad test in that case?

> -Krutika

> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah < pgurusid at redhat.com
> > wrote:

> > Hi,
> 

> > Are you able consistently reproduce this on your local system as well? If
> > so
> > can you share the system?
> 
> > I see that it has failed for many other patches as well.
> > http://fstat.gluster.org/weeks/1/failure/34
> 

> > Regards,
> 
> > Poornima
> 

> > > From: "Krutika Dhananjay" < kdhananj at redhat.com >
> > 
> 
> > > To: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" < pgurusid at redhat.com >, "Soumya Koduri" <
> > > skoduri at redhat.com >
> > 
> 
> > > Cc: "Pranith Karampuri" < pkarampu at redhat.com >
> > 
> 
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 8:47:57 AM
> > 
> 
> > > Subject: Regarding a consistent gfapi .t failure
> > 
> 

> > > Hi,
> > 
> 

> > > The test tests/basic/gfapi/bug1291259.t seems to be failing consistently
> > > on
> > > my 3.9 backport http://review.gluster.org/#/c/16046/
> > 
> 

> > > The patch itself makes changes only in compound fops, so it is unlikely
> > > that
> > > the failure is caused by the patch itself.
> > 
> 

> > > Here's a sample failure run:
> > > https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/2134/console
> > 
> 

> > > I ran the test on my laptop and it passes consistently.
> > 
> 
> > > I ran the test on a borrowed centos slave and it passes there as well.
> > 
> 
> > > I looked at the logfile bug1291259.log from the archived build failure
> > > logs
> > 
> 
> > > but there are no failures.
> > 
> 

> > > If you have any ideas on how to proceed further, could you please suggest
> > > the
> > > same?
> > 
> 

> > > -Krutika
> > 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20161214/481c311e/attachment-0001.html>