[Gluster-devel] doubts in using gf_event/gf_msg

[Aravinda]

It is possible to overload gf_lg/gf_msg to send events to local eventsd. 
But we have to do additional parsing if we need to select the logs to 
convert as events. If we introduce new API, then it is not different 
from existing wrt adding events code in multiple places. But if it helps 
in sharing the host/port and other information(which we are discussing 
to support client events), I can give it a try(Move gf_event inside 
logging infra)

regards
Aravinda

On Wednesday 24 August 2016 05:15 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> Just resending in case you missed this mail.
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri 
> <pkarampu at redhat.com <mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     hi Aravinda,
>            I was wondering what is your opinion in sending selected
>     logs as events instead of treating them specially. Is this
>     something you guys considered? Do you think it is a bad idea to do
>     it that way? We can even come up with a new api which logs and
>     then sends it as event.
>
>     -- 
>     Pranith
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Pranith

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20160824/aa836375/attachment.html>