[Gluster-devel] Regression failure due to bad test case

Atin Mukherjee amukherj at redhat.com
Tue Oct 27 10:52:06 UTC 2015



On 10/27/2015 04:15 PM, Saravanakumar Arumugam wrote:
> Hi Niels,
> Thanks!
> 
> As per my understanding, core file generated due to bad test case.
> 
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> Test Summary Report
> -------------------
> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-948686.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 21 Failed: 2)
>   Failed tests:  14-15
> Files=1, Tests=21, 33 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.00 sys +  2.15 cusr 
> 0.68 csys =  2.85 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-948686.t: bad status 1
> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-948686.t: 1 new core files
> Ignoring failure from known-bad test ./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-948686.t
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> 
> I think we should ignore this core file as it is due to bad test ?
That's correct

> 
> The main issue here is while copying logs.
> Again If I understand correctly, logs are generated due to core files.
> 
> So, ignoring core files generated due to bad test case is best choice
> here??
> 
> Thanks
> Saravana
> 
> 
> On 10/27/2015 03:10 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 02:31:44PM +0530, Saravanakumar Arumugam wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Thanks Atin! You are correct.
>>> <<<<<<<<<<
>>> + '[' 1 '!=' 0 ']'
>>> + set +x
>>> Going to copy log tarball for processing on
>>> http://elk.cloud.gluster.org/
>>> sort: write failed: standard output: Broken pipe
>>> sort: write error
>>> Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
>>> Finished: FAILURE
>>> <<<<<<<<<<
>>>
>>> I remember facing similar issue earlier.
>> Yes, and this is not an error that causes a regression test to be marked
>> as failed.
>>
>> This run dumped a core at one point, that is what needs investigation:
>>
>>      [06:23:24] ./tests/performance/quick-read.t .. ok     8075 ms
>>      [06:23:24]
>>      All tests successful.
>>      Files=1, Tests=20,  8 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.00 sys +  1.13
>> cusr  0.38 csys =  1.53 CPU)
>>      Result: PASS
>>      + RET=0
>>      ++ wc -l
>>      ++ ls -l /core.32471
>>      + cur_count=1
>>      + '[' 1 '!=' 0 ']'
>>      + mkdir -p /build/install/cores
>>      + mv /core.32471 /build/install/cores
>>      + filename=archived_builds/build-install-20151027:03:29:01.tar
>>      + rm -f /build/install/cores/liblist.txt
>>      + rm -f /build/install/cores/liblist.txt.tmp
>>      ++ ls /build/install/cores/core.32471
>>      + CORELIST=/build/install/cores/core.32471
>>
>>
>> Niels
>>
>>> Any idea how to overcome these types of failures apart from retriggering
>>> regression :) ?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Saravana
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/27/2015 02:13 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>>>> On 10/27/2015 12:33 PM, Saravanakumar Arumugam wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I am facing regression failure http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12239
>>>>>
>>>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/15166/consoleFull
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But both the test cases are marked bad??
>>>>>
>>>>> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-948686.t
>>>>>   ./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-1238706-daemons-stop-on-peer-cleanup.t
>>>>>
>>>>> It should be success as both the test cases are marked as bad ??
>>>> I don't think the failure was due to a bad test not passing regression.
>>>> All the tests passed apart from bad test(s). Copying the log tarball to
>>>> a location actually failed here. See at the bottom of the page.
>>>>
>>>> ~Atin
>>>>> Please refer the log for details.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Saravana
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list