[Gluster-devel] spurious regression errors getting worse

[Atin Mukherjee]

-Atin
Sent from one plus one
On Nov 9, 2015 7:11 PM, "Dan Lambright" <dlambrig at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Niels de Vos" <ndevos at redhat.com>
> > To: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukherj at redhat.com>, "Rajesh Joseph" <
rjoseph at redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Dan Lambright" <dlambrig at redhat.com>, "Gluster Devel" <
gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> > Sent: Monday, November 9, 2015 7:39:28 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] spurious regression errors getting worse
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 09:36:50AM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/06/2015 07:47 AM, Dan Lambright wrote:
> > > > It seems to have become more difficult in the last week to pass
> > > > regression tests.
> > > >
> > > > I've started recording the tests that seem to be failing the most:
> > > >
> > > > bug-1221481-allow-fops-on-dir-split-brain.t
> > > > bug-1238706-daemons-stop-on-peer-cleanup.t
> > > You shouldn't be worried about
> > > bug-1238706-daemons-stop-on-peer-cleanup.t as its marked as bad. Also
> > > respective failure links for all these tests would help component
owners
> > > to root cause the issues. Probably you could add all of them here [1]
> >
> > We really need to file bugs for the problems, it allows us to get
> > notifications about problems. Etherpads can be nice to dedicated work,
> > but many of us do not check them regularly.
>
> There does not seem to be a small core set of bugs that fails regularly.
Rather, the set of spurious bugs seems to be large.
> So we would be filing a lot of bugs. But, it could be done. And is
probably more effective than a rarely consulted ether pad.
Filing bugs is definitely a next step process even if the etherpad is
maintained. So my two cents. I just wanted to ensure that we have at least
one place holder (etherpad here as that has been a process till now for
spurious failures) to file all these failures.
>
>
> >
> > Rajesh, tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1227646.t resulted in a core for this
> > run:
> >
> >
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/15664/consoleFull
> >
> > I'm not sure if someone is looking into that already?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Niels
> >
> > >
> > > [1] https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Atin
> > > > ./tests/bugs/quota/bug-1235182.t
> > > > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1066798.t
> > > > ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1166197.t
> > > >
> > > > In some cases regression must be run a half dozen times before
finally
> > > > passing.
> > > >
> > > > Could the owners those tests please look into these?
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > > > Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > > Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20151109/2a67325d/attachment.html>