[Gluster-devel] Spurious regression: Checking on 3 test cases
Vijay Bellur
vbellur at redhat.com
Fri May 22 04:19:15 UTC 2015
On 05/22/2015 07:13 AM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote:
>
>> Are the following tests in any spurious regression failure lists? or,
>> noticed by others?
>>
>> 1) ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-1.t
>> Run:
>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9363/consoleFull
>>
>> 2) ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t
>> Run:
>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9406/consoleFull
>>
>> NOTE: This is a regression run for the same patch as in (1) above, and
>> ec-5-1.t passed in this instance.
>>
>> 3) ./tests/performance/open-behind.t
>> Run:
>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9407/consoleFull
>
I remember seeing this test fail a few days back but seem to have missed
including this test in the etherpad.
> None of the above tests are being tracked at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures.
> Should we add them to the list?
Yes and we should add them to is_bad_test() in run-tests.sh too.
Thanks,
Vijay
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list