[Gluster-devel] spurious failures in tests/basic/afr/sparse-file-self-heal.t

Vijay Bellur vbellur at redhat.com
Sat May 2 03:30:35 UTC 2015


On 05/02/2015 08:17 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> hi,
>       As per the etherpad:
> https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures
>
>   * tests/basic/afr/sparse-file-self-heal.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 64 Failed: 35)
>
>   * Failed tests:  1-6, 11, 20-30, 33-34, 36, 41, 50-61, 64
>
>   * Happens in master (Mon 30th March - git commit id
>     3feaf1648528ff39e23748ac9004a77595460c9d)
>
>   * (hasn't yet been added to BZs)
>
> If glusterd itself fails to come up, of course the test will fail :-).
> Is it still happening?
>

We have not been actively curating this list for the last few days and 
am not certain if this failure happens anymore.

Investigating why a regression run fails for our patches and fixing them 
(though unrelated to our patch) should be the most effective way going 
ahead.

-Vijay




More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list