[Gluster-devel] Responsibilities and expectations of our maintainers
Vijay Bellur
vbellur at redhat.com
Tue Mar 31 06:44:29 UTC 2015
On 03/28/2015 02:08 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Emmanuel,
>> What can we do to make it vote -2 when it fails? Things will
>> automatically fall in place if it gives -2.
>
> I will do this once I will have recovered. The changelog change broke
> regression for weeks, and now we have a fix for it I discover many other
> poblems have crop.
>
> While there, to anyone:
> - dd bs=1M is not portable. Use
> dd bs=1024k
> - echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches is not portable. use instead this
> command that fails but flushes inodes first.
> ( cd $M0 && umount $M0 )
> - umount $N0 brings many problems, use instead
> EXPECT_WITHIN $UMOUNT_TIMEOUT "Y" umount_nfs $N0
>
I wonder if we can add these as checks to flag errors in checkpatch.pl
so that we nip these problems off even before they appear for review?
Thanks,
Vijay
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list