[Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression recovered (with patches)

[Justin Clift]

On 29 Mar 2015, at 21:31, Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu at netbsd.org> wrote:
> Hi
> 
> We now have the patches to recover NetBSD regression. This needs to be
> reviewed and merged (it would be nice if it could be before release-3.7
> branching):
> 
> http://review.gluster.org/10030
> http://review.gluster.org/10032
> http://review.gluster.org/10033
> http://review.gluster.org/10034
> http://review.gluster.org/9831
> http://review.gluster.org/9944
> 
> I also have the following pending change that may deserve a look before
> branching:
> http://review.gluster.org/10017
> 
> Once all that will be merged, we will still have a few failing cases for
> which I need some help (see details below):
> tests/basic/afr/split-brain-resolution.t 
> tests/basic/ec/
> tests/basic/tier/tier.t
> tests/encryption/crypt.t
> tests/features/trash.t
> 
> I will disable them so that NetBSD regression vote can be useful. But it
> would be nice if people coule help fixing them. Here are the details:
> 
> 1) tests/basic/afr/split-brain-resolution.t 
> 100% reliable failure, I posted an analysis of it in 
> <1m21hnh.yiu9vbyqrhg9M%manu at netbsd.org>
> 
> 
> 2) tests/basic/ec  tests have rare sprious failures, Xavier Hernandez
> said he will look at it when time will allow it.
> 
> 
> 3) tests/basic/tier/tier.t has 100% reliable failure on nbslave70
> 
> [19:19:07] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. 20/32
> md5: /d/backends/patchy1/d1/data2.txt: No such file or directory
> [19:19:07] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. 23/32 
> not ok 23 Got "1" instead of "0"
> md5: /d/backends/patchy1/d1/data3.txt: No such file or directory
> [19:19:07] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. 24/32 
> not ok 24 Got "1" instead of "0"
> umount: /mnt/glusterfs/0: Device busy
> [19:19:07] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. Failed 2/32 subtests 
> 
> ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 32 Failed: 2)
>  Failed tests:  23-24
> 
> 
> Note that tier.t needs a portability patch not yet submitted:
> diff --git a/tests/basic/tier/tier.t b/tests/basic/tier/tier.t
> index 383d470..9cc754a 100755
> --- a/tests/basic/tier/tier.t
> +++ b/tests/basic/tier/tier.t
> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ sleep 12
> uuidgen >> d1/data2.txt
> 
> # Check promotion on read to slow tier
> -echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> +( cd $M0 && umount $M0 ) 
> cat d1/data3.txt
> sleep 5
> EXPECT_WITHIN $PROMOTE_TIMEOUT "0" file_on_fast_tier d1/data2.txt
> 
> 
> 
> 4) tests/encryption/crypt.t has 100% reliable error on nbslave70. This
> is annoying because that one passed before:
> 
> [19:21:21] ./tests/encryption/crypt.t .. 19/39 
> ln: /mnt/glusterfs/0/testfile: Protocol error
> not ok 20 
> mv: rename /mnt/glusterfs/0/testfile to
> /mnt/glusterfs/0/testfile-renamed: Protocol error
> not ok 21 
> diff: /mnt/glusterfs/0/testfile-symlink: No such file or directory
> not ok 26 
> [19:21:21] ./tests/encryption/crypt.t .. Failed 3/39 subtests 
> 
> ./tests/encryption/crypt.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 39 Failed: 3)
>  Failed tests:  20-21, 26
> 
> 
> 5) tests/features/trash.t is completely broken. Note that
> http://review.gluster.org/10033 patches trash.t for NetBSD compatibility
> 
> [19:24:33] ./tests/features/trash.t .. 1/65 No volumes present
> [19:24:33] ./tests/features/trash.t .. 15/65 
> not ok 15 
> [19:24:33] ./tests/features/trash.t .. 18/65 
> not ok 18 
> [19:24:33] ./tests/features/trash.t .. 30/65 
> not ok 30 
> (...)
> ./tests/features/trash.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 65 Failed: 16)
>  Failed tests:  15, 18, 30, 33-34, 38-39, 57-65

Awesome. :)

+ Justin

--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift