[Gluster-devel] [Cinder] Cinder-GlusterFS CI update

Justin Clift justin at gluster.org
Fri Mar 13 21:38:23 UTC 2015


Cool. :)

Will this become a voting issue in the future, after a proven period
of stability or something?

Also, did the CentOS 7 issues get resolved, or is that still something
to be done?

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift


On 10 Mar 2015, at 07:05, Deepak Shetty <dpkshetty at gmail.com> wrote:
> I thought this would be interesting to share with the Gluster community as well.
> 
> thanx,
> deepak
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Deepak Shetty <dpkshetty at gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:01 PM
> Subject: [Cinder] Cinder-GlusterFS CI update
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> 
> 
> Hi All,
>     Quick update. 
> 
> We added GlusterFS CI job (gate-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs) to check pipeline (non-voting) after the patch @ [1]  was merged.
> 
> Its been running successfully ( so far so good ) on Cinder patches, few examples are in [2]
> 
> I also updated the 3rd party CI status page [3] with the current status.
> 
> [1]: https://review.openstack.org/162556
> [2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162532/ , https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157956/ , https://review.openstack.org/#/c/160682/
> [3]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status
> 
> thanx,
> deepak & bharat
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift



More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list