[Gluster-devel] Gluster and GCC 5.1
Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
kkeithle at redhat.com
Mon Jun 29 18:45:50 UTC 2015
On 06/29/2015 02:40 PM, Anoop C S wrote:
> On 06/29/2015 11:56 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>> On 06/29/2015 02:04 PM, Anoop C S wrote:
>>> Reading through gcc docs I could see that with gcc v5, it
>>> defaults to C99 semantics and compiling with -fgnu89-inline
>>> solves the above issue. I'm wondering how glusterfs compiled
>>> successfully without providing this flag.
>> Well, it didn't originally.
>> Most of the bugs were fixed before Fedora 22 arrived with gcc-5.
I didn't say all of them had been fixed. ;-)
>> E.g. by building on Fedora Rawhide last year, reporting the bugs,
>> and getting them fixed before Rawhide turned into Fedora 22.
> Immediately after the Fedora 22 release, we had a similar issue
> reported from a user with gcc v5 and was fixed through .
Yes, there were still some, and/or some had crept (back) in, when
Fedora22 was released.
I think we're still finding some more. Not all of the developers are
using Fedora 22 yet. I know a few that are still on Fedora 19!
Niels and I had a brief chat a while back about adding a Fedora 22 VM to
Jenkins to catch these. I don't think anything ever happened though.
More information about the Gluster-devel