[Gluster-devel] /tests/bugs/quota/bug-1153964.t is consistently failing

Xavier Hernandez xhernandez at datalab.es
Thu Jun 25 09:01:57 UTC 2015


Thank you very much :)

Xavi

On 06/24/2015 08:21 AM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I request you to re-base your patch which are failed regression with
> test-case bug-1153964.t
>
> Thanks,
> Vijay
>
>
> On Wednesday 24 June 2015 11:42 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11362/ has been merged.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukherj at redhat.com>
>>> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowdapp at redhat.com>
>>> Cc: "Niels de Vos" <ndevos at redhat.com>, "Vijaikumar M"
>>> <vmallika at redhat.com>, "Raghavendra G"
>>> <raghavendra at gluster.com>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 10:55:02 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] /tests/bugs/quota/bug-1153964.t is
>>> consistently failing
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/24/2015 10:53 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukherj at redhat.com>
>>>>> To: "Niels de Vos" <ndevos at redhat.com>, "Vijaikumar M"
>>>>> <vmallika at redhat.com>
>>>>> Cc: "Raghavendra G" <raghavendra at gluster.com>, "Gluster Devel"
>>>>> <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 10:15:12 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] /tests/bugs/quota/bug-1153964.t is
>>>>> consistently failing
>>>>>
>>>>> When is this patch getting merged, this is blocking other patches
>>>>> to get
>>>>> in.
>>>> Revert of http://review.gluster.org/11311, is waiting for regression
>>>> runs
>>>> to pass. There are three patches (duplicates of each other). If
>>>> anyone of
>>>> them pass both regression runs, I'll merge them. As far as refcounting
>>>> mechanism go, it'll take some time to review and merge the patch.
>>> Once the revert patch is merged, we are good to go. Please let us know
>>> once it's merged as post that all patches need rebase.
>>>
>>> ~Atin
>>>>> ~Atin
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/23/2015 06:26 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 05:30:39PM +0530, Vijaikumar M wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tuesday 23 June 2015 04:28 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 03:45:43PM +0530, Vijaikumar M wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I have submitted below patch which fixes this issue. I am handling
>>>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>> clean-up with reference countmechanism.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11361
>>>>>>>> Is there a reason you can not use the (new) refcounting
>>>>>>>> functions that
>>>>>>>> were introduceed with http://review.gluster.org/11022 ?
>>>>>>> I was not aware that ref-counting patch was merged. Sure we will use
>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>> function and re-submit my patch.
>>>>>> Ok, thanks!
>>>>>> Niels
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Vijay
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It would be nicer to standardize all refcounting mechanisms on one
>>>>>>>> implementation. I hope we can replace existing refcounting with
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>> too. Introducing more refcounting ways is not going to be helpful.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Niels
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Vijay
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday 23 June 2015 12:58 PM, Raghavendra G wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Multiple replies to same query. Pick one ;).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Venky Shankar
>>>>>>>>>> <yknev.shankar at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:yknev.shankar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     OK. Two reverts of the same patch ;)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     Pick one.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
>>>>>>>>>>     <rgowdapp at redhat.com <mailto:rgowdapp at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>     > Seems like its a memory corruption caused by:
>>>>>>>>>>     > http://review.gluster.org/11311
>>>>>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>>>>>     > I've reverted the patch at:
>>>>>>>>>>     > http://review.gluster.org/11360
>>>>>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>>>>>     > ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>>>     >> From: "Xavier Hernandez" <xhernandez at datalab.es
>>>>>>>>>>     <mailto:xhernandez at datalab.es>>
>>>>>>>>>>     >> To: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>>>>>>>     <mailto:gluster-devel at gluster.org>>
>>>>>>>>>>     >> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 12:44:47 PM
>>>>>>>>>>     >> Subject: [Gluster-devel]
>>>>>>>>>> /tests/bugs/quota/bug-1153964.t is
>>>>>>>>>>     consistently failing
>>>>>>>>>>     >>
>>>>>>>>>>     >> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>     >>
>>>>>>>>>>     >> the quota test bug-1153964.t is failing consistently for a
>>>>>>>>>>     >> totally
>>>>>>>>>>     >> unrelated patch. Is this a known issue ?
>>>>>>>>>>     >>
>>>>>>>>>>     >>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/11142/consoleFull
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     >>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/11165/consoleFull
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     >>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/11172/consoleFull
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     >>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/11191/consoleFull
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     >>
>>>>>>>>>>     >> Xavi
>>>>>>>>>>     >> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>     >> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>     >> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>>>>>>>>>>     >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>>>>>>>     >>
>>>>>>>>>>     > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>     > Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>     > Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>>>>>>>>>>     > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>>>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>     Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>     Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>>>>>>>>>>     http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Raghavendra G
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> ~Atin
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>>
>>> --
>>> ~Atin
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list