[Gluster-devel] GF_FOP_IPC changes
skoduri at redhat.com
Thu Jun 25 06:40:04 UTC 2015
On 06/25/2015 09:00 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 02:49 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>>> It knows which bricks are up/down. But they may not be the latest. Will
>>> that matter?
>> AFAIK it's sufficient at this point to know which are up/down.
> In that case, we need two functions which give first active child and
> next_active_child in case of failure.
Do you suggest then in all default_*_cbk(), on receiving ENOTCONN
failure, we re-send fop to next_active_child?
More information about the Gluster-devel