[Gluster-devel] /tests/bugs/quota/bug-1153964.t is consistently failing

Niels de Vos ndevos at redhat.com
Tue Jun 23 12:56:05 UTC 2015


On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 05:30:39PM +0530, Vijaikumar M wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 23 June 2015 04:28 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 03:45:43PM +0530, Vijaikumar M wrote:
> >>I have submitted below patch which fixes this issue. I am handling memory
> >>clean-up with reference countmechanism.
> >>
> >>http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11361
> >Is there a reason you can not use the (new) refcounting functions that
> >were introduceed with http://review.gluster.org/11022 ?
> 
> I was not aware that ref-counting patch was merged. Sure we will use these
> function and re-submit my patch.

Ok, thanks!
Niels

> 
> Thanks,
> Vijay
> 
> 
> >It would be nicer to standardize all refcounting mechanisms on one
> >implementation. I hope we can replace existing refcounting with this one
> >too. Introducing more refcounting ways is not going to be helpful.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Niels
> >
> >>Thanks,
> >>Vijay
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On Tuesday 23 June 2015 12:58 PM, Raghavendra G wrote:
> >>>Multiple replies to same query. Pick one ;).
> >>>
> >>>On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Venky Shankar <yknev.shankar at gmail.com
> >>><mailto:yknev.shankar at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>    OK. Two reverts of the same patch ;)
> >>>
> >>>    Pick one.
> >>>
> >>>    On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
> >>>    <rgowdapp at redhat.com <mailto:rgowdapp at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >>>    > Seems like its a memory corruption caused by:
> >>>    > http://review.gluster.org/11311
> >>>    >
> >>>    > I've reverted the patch at:
> >>>    > http://review.gluster.org/11360
> >>>    >
> >>>    > ----- Original Message -----
> >>>    >> From: "Xavier Hernandez" <xhernandez at datalab.es
> >>>    <mailto:xhernandez at datalab.es>>
> >>>    >> To: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org
> >>>    <mailto:gluster-devel at gluster.org>>
> >>>    >> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 12:44:47 PM
> >>>    >> Subject: [Gluster-devel] /tests/bugs/quota/bug-1153964.t is
> >>>    consistently failing
> >>>    >>
> >>>    >> Hi,
> >>>    >>
> >>>    >> the quota test bug-1153964.t is failing consistently for a totally
> >>>    >> unrelated patch. Is this a known issue ?
> >>>    >>
> >>>    >>
> >>>    http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/11142/consoleFull
> >>>    >>
> >>>    http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/11165/consoleFull
> >>>    >>
> >>>    http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/11172/consoleFull
> >>>    >>
> >>>    http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/11191/consoleFull
> >>>    >>
> >>>    >> Xavi
> >>>    >> _______________________________________________
> >>>    >> Gluster-devel mailing list
> >>>    >> Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> >>>    >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >>>    >>
> >>>    > _______________________________________________
> >>>    > Gluster-devel mailing list
> >>>    > Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> >>>    > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >>>    _______________________________________________
> >>>    Gluster-devel mailing list
> >>>    Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> >>>    http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>-- 
> >>>Raghavendra G
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Gluster-devel mailing list
> >>>Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> >>>http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Gluster-devel mailing list
> >>Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> >>http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list