[Gluster-devel] /tests/bugs/quota/bug-1153964.t is consistently failing
Niels de Vos
ndevos at redhat.com
Tue Jun 23 12:56:05 UTC 2015
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 05:30:39PM +0530, Vijaikumar M wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday 23 June 2015 04:28 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 03:45:43PM +0530, Vijaikumar M wrote:
> >>I have submitted below patch which fixes this issue. I am handling memory
> >>clean-up with reference countmechanism.
> >>
> >>http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11361
> >Is there a reason you can not use the (new) refcounting functions that
> >were introduceed with http://review.gluster.org/11022 ?
>
> I was not aware that ref-counting patch was merged. Sure we will use these
> function and re-submit my patch.
Ok, thanks!
Niels
>
> Thanks,
> Vijay
>
>
> >It would be nicer to standardize all refcounting mechanisms on one
> >implementation. I hope we can replace existing refcounting with this one
> >too. Introducing more refcounting ways is not going to be helpful.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Niels
> >
> >>Thanks,
> >>Vijay
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On Tuesday 23 June 2015 12:58 PM, Raghavendra G wrote:
> >>>Multiple replies to same query. Pick one ;).
> >>>
> >>>On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Venky Shankar <yknev.shankar at gmail.com
> >>><mailto:yknev.shankar at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> OK. Two reverts of the same patch ;)
> >>>
> >>> Pick one.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
> >>> <rgowdapp at redhat.com <mailto:rgowdapp at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >>> > Seems like its a memory corruption caused by:
> >>> > http://review.gluster.org/11311
> >>> >
> >>> > I've reverted the patch at:
> >>> > http://review.gluster.org/11360
> >>> >
> >>> > ----- Original Message -----
> >>> >> From: "Xavier Hernandez" <xhernandez at datalab.es
> >>> <mailto:xhernandez at datalab.es>>
> >>> >> To: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org
> >>> <mailto:gluster-devel at gluster.org>>
> >>> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 12:44:47 PM
> >>> >> Subject: [Gluster-devel] /tests/bugs/quota/bug-1153964.t is
> >>> consistently failing
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Hi,
> >>> >>
> >>> >> the quota test bug-1153964.t is failing consistently for a totally
> >>> >> unrelated patch. Is this a known issue ?
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/11142/consoleFull
> >>> >>
> >>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/11165/consoleFull
> >>> >>
> >>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/11172/consoleFull
> >>> >>
> >>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/11191/consoleFull
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Xavi
> >>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> Gluster-devel mailing list
> >>> >> Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> >>> >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >>> >>
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> >>> > Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> >>> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Gluster-devel mailing list
> >>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> >>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Raghavendra G
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Gluster-devel mailing list
> >>>Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> >>>http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Gluster-devel mailing list
> >>Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> >>http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list