[Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression status

[Ravishankar N]

On 06/03/2015 07:13 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:30:31PM +0000, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Here is NetBSD regression status for master and release-3.7:
>>
>> The following tests always fail:
>> ./tests/basic/ec/ec.t
>> ./tests/basic/ec/quota.t
>> ./tests/basic/ec/self-heal.t
>> ./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t
>>
>> Uncharted terriotiry:
>> ./tests/bugs
>>
>> Fails, but never passed:
>> ./tests/geo-rep
>>
>>
>> Additionnaly, ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t passes but:
>> Running tests in file ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t
>> [10:03:02] ./tests/basic/tier/tier.t .. 25/35 umount: unknown option -- l
>> Usage: umount [-fvFR] [-t fstypelist] special | node
>>           umount -a[fvF] [-h host] [-t fstypelist]
>>
>> It is a bit nasty to use a Linux-only option where portability was
>> the goal:
>> # Check promotion on read to slow tier
>> ( cd $M0 ; umount -l $M0 ) # fail but drops kernel cache
> I'm also not sure if this really drops the caches on Linux. Someone
> tested it (Ravi?) and did not see the same cache reduction as when using
> "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches".

Yes, my review comment in 
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10253/5/tests/basic/afr/sparse-file-self-heal.t 
describes what I observed.
-Ravi
> We probably need to introduce a function for this that handles both the
> NetBSD and Linux methods.
>
> Niels