[Gluster-devel] Modifying GlusterFS to cope with C99 inline semantics

Atin Mukherjee amukherj at redhat.com
Tue Jul 28 11:31:40 UTC 2015

On 07/28/2015 04:31 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>> IMO this is a different issue, not related to inline semantics.  Anand
>> has already posted a patch [1] to address it.
>> [1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11757/
> Thanks, Atin.  Avoiding spurious failures in this test would be a good
> thing.  Do you have any information about when the underlying problem
> in glusterd might get fixed?
Glusterd 2.0 will definitely solve this kind of issues where n * n
handshaking can cause race. For existing glusterD having volumes list
URCU protected could solve it, but I don't see that's getting done in
near future.


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list