[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] missing files

Ben Turner bturner at redhat.com
Fri Feb 6 20:33:42 UTC 2015 

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Justin Clift" <justin at gluster.org>
> To: "Benjamin Turner" <bennyturns at gmail.com>
> Cc: "David F. Robinson" <david.robinson at corvidtec.com>, gluster-users at gluster.org, "Gluster Devel"
> <gluster-devel at gluster.org>, "Ben Turner" <bturner at redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 6, 2015 3:27:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users]  missing files
> 
> On 6 Feb 2015, at 02:05, Benjamin Turner <bennyturns at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think that the multi threaded epoll changes that _just_ landed in master
> > will help resolve this, but they are so new I haven't been able to test
> > this.  I'll know more when I get a chance to test tomorrow.
> 
> Which multi-threaded epoll code just landed in master?  Are you thinking
> of this one?
> 
>   http://review.gluster.org/#/c/3842/
> 
> If so, it's not in master yet. ;)

Doh!  I just saw - "Required patches are all upstream now" and assumed they were merged.  I have been in class all week so I am not up2date with everything.  I gave instructions on compiling it from the gerrit patches + master so if David wants to give it a go he can.  Sorry for the confusion.

-b
 
> + Justin
> 
> 
> > -b
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:04 PM, David F. Robinson
> > <david.robinson at corvidtec.com> wrote:
> > Isn't rsync what geo-rep uses?
> > 
> > David  (Sent from mobile)
> > 
> > ===============================
> > David F. Robinson, Ph.D.
> > President - Corvid Technologies
> > 704.799.6944 x101 [office]
> > 704.252.1310      [cell]
> > 704.799.7974      [fax]
> > David.Robinson at corvidtec.com
> > http://www.corvidtechnologies.com
> > 
> > > On Feb 5, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Ben Turner <bturner at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "Ben Turner" <bturner at redhat.com>
> > >> To: "David F. Robinson" <david.robinson at corvidtec.com>
> > >> Cc: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com>, "Xavier Hernandez"
> > >> <xhernandez at datalab.es>, "Benjamin Turner"
> > >> <bennyturns at gmail.com>, gluster-users at gluster.org, "Gluster Devel"
> > >> <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> > >> Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 5:22:26 PM
> > >> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] missing files
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>> From: "David F. Robinson" <david.robinson at corvidtec.com>
> > >>> To: "Ben Turner" <bturner at redhat.com>
> > >>> Cc: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com>, "Xavier Hernandez"
> > >>> <xhernandez at datalab.es>, "Benjamin Turner"
> > >>> <bennyturns at gmail.com>, gluster-users at gluster.org, "Gluster Devel"
> > >>> <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> > >>> Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 5:01:13 PM
> > >>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] missing files
> > >>>
> > >>> I'll send you the emails I sent Pranith with the logs. What causes
> > >>> these
> > >>> disconnects?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks David!  Disconnects happen when there are interruption in
> > >> communication between peers, normally there is ping timeout that
> > >> happens.
> > >> It could be anything from a flaky NW to the system was to busy to
> > >> respond
> > >> to the pings.  My initial take is more towards the ladder as rsync is
> > >> absolutely the worst use case for gluster - IIRC it writes in 4kb
> > >> blocks.  I
> > >> try to keep my writes at least 64KB as in my testing that is the
> > >> smallest
> > >> block size I can write with before perf starts to really drop off.  I'll
> > >> try
> > >> something similar in the lab.
> > >
> > > Ok I do think that the file being self healed is RCA for what you were
> > > seeing.  Lets look at one of the disconnects:
> > >
> > > data-brick02a-homegfs.log:[2015-02-03 20:54:02.772180] I
> > > [server.c:518:server_rpc_notify] 0-homegfs-server: disconnecting
> > > connection from
> > > gfs01b.corvidtec.com-4175-2015/02/02-16:44:31:179119-homegfs-client-2-0-1
> > >
> > > And in the glustershd.log from the gfs01b_glustershd.log file:
> > >
> > > [2015-02-03 20:55:48.001797] I
> > > [afr-self-heal-entry.c:554:afr_selfheal_entry_do] 0-homegfs-replicate-0:
> > > performing entry selfheal on 6c79a368-edaa-432b-bef9-ec690ab42448
> > > [2015-02-03 20:55:49.341996] I
> > > [afr-self-heal-common.c:476:afr_log_selfheal] 0-homegfs-replicate-0:
> > > Completed entry selfheal on 6c79a368-edaa-432b-bef9-ec690ab42448.
> > > source=1 sinks=0
> > > [2015-02-03 20:55:49.343093] I
> > > [afr-self-heal-entry.c:554:afr_selfheal_entry_do] 0-homegfs-replicate-0:
> > > performing entry selfheal on 792cb0d6-9290-4447-8cd7-2b2d7a116a69
> > > [2015-02-03 20:55:50.463652] I
> > > [afr-self-heal-common.c:476:afr_log_selfheal] 0-homegfs-replicate-0:
> > > Completed entry selfheal on 792cb0d6-9290-4447-8cd7-2b2d7a116a69.
> > > source=1 sinks=0
> > > [2015-02-03 20:55:51.465289] I
> > > [afr-self-heal-metadata.c:54:__afr_selfheal_metadata_do]
> > > 0-homegfs-replicate-0: performing metadata selfheal on
> > > 403e661a-1c27-4e79-9867-c0572aba2b3c
> > > [2015-02-03 20:55:51.466515] I
> > > [afr-self-heal-common.c:476:afr_log_selfheal] 0-homegfs-replicate-0:
> > > Completed metadata selfheal on 403e661a-1c27-4e79-9867-c0572aba2b3c.
> > > source=1 sinks=0
> > > [2015-02-03 20:55:51.467098] I
> > > [afr-self-heal-entry.c:554:afr_selfheal_entry_do] 0-homegfs-replicate-0:
> > > performing entry selfheal on 403e661a-1c27-4e79-9867-c0572aba2b3c
> > > [2015-02-03 20:55:55.257808] I
> > > [afr-self-heal-common.c:476:afr_log_selfheal] 0-homegfs-replicate-0:
> > > Completed entry selfheal on 403e661a-1c27-4e79-9867-c0572aba2b3c.
> > > source=1 sinks=0
> > > [2015-02-03 20:55:55.258548] I
> > > [afr-self-heal-metadata.c:54:__afr_selfheal_metadata_do]
> > > 0-homegfs-replicate-0: performing metadata selfheal on
> > > c612ee2f-2fb4-4157-a9ab-5a2d5603c541
> > > [2015-02-03 20:55:55.259367] I
> > > [afr-self-heal-common.c:476:afr_log_selfheal] 0-homegfs-replicate-0:
> > > Completed metadata selfheal on c612ee2f-2fb4-4157-a9ab-5a2d5603c541.
> > > source=1 sinks=0
> > > [2015-02-03 20:55:55.259980] I
> > > [afr-self-heal-entry.c:554:afr_selfheal_entry_do] 0-homegfs-replicate-0:
> > > performing entry selfheal on c612ee2f-2fb4-4157-a9ab-5a2d5603c541
> > >
> > > As you can see the self heal logs are just spammed with files being
> > > healed, and I looked at a couple of disconnects and I see self heals
> > > getting run shortly after on the bricks that were down.  Now we need to
> > > find the cause of the disconnects, I am thinking once the disconnects
> > > are resolved the files should be properly copied over without SH having
> > > to fix things.  Like I said I'll give this a go on my lab systems and
> > > see if I can repro the disconnects, I'll have time to run through it
> > > tomorrow.  If in the mean time anyone else has a theory / anything to
> > > add here it would be appreciated.
> > >
> > > -b
> > >
> > >> -b
> > >>
> > >>> David  (Sent from mobile)
> > >>>
> > >>> ===============================
> > >>> David F. Robinson, Ph.D.
> > >>> President - Corvid Technologies
> > >>> 704.799.6944 x101 [office]
> > >>> 704.252.1310      [cell]
> > >>> 704.799.7974      [fax]
> > >>> David.Robinson at corvidtec.com
> > >>> http://www.corvidtechnologies.com
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Feb 5, 2015, at 4:55 PM, Ben Turner <bturner at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>>>> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com>
> > >>>>> To: "Xavier Hernandez" <xhernandez at datalab.es>, "David F. Robinson"
> > >>>>> <david.robinson at corvidtec.com>, "Benjamin Turner"
> > >>>>> <bennyturns at gmail.com>
> > >>>>> Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org, "Gluster Devel"
> > >>>>> <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> > >>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 5:30:04 AM
> > >>>>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] missing files
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 02/05/2015 03:48 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> > >>>>>> I believe David already fixed this. I hope this is the same issue he
> > >>>>>> told about permissions issue.
> > >>>>> Oops, it is not. I will take a look.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Yes David exactly like these:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> data-brick02a-homegfs.log:[2015-02-03 19:09:34.568842] I
> > >>>> [server.c:518:server_rpc_notify] 0-homegfs-server: disconnecting
> > >>>> connection from
> > >>>> gfs02a.corvidtec.com-18563-2015/02/03-19:07:58:519134-homegfs-client-2-0-0
> > >>>> data-brick02a-homegfs.log:[2015-02-03 19:09:41.286551] I
> > >>>> [server.c:518:server_rpc_notify] 0-homegfs-server: disconnecting
> > >>>> connection from
> > >>>> gfs01a.corvidtec.com-12804-2015/02/03-19:09:38:497808-homegfs-client-2-0-0
> > >>>> data-brick02a-homegfs.log:[2015-02-03 19:16:35.906412] I
> > >>>> [server.c:518:server_rpc_notify] 0-homegfs-server: disconnecting
> > >>>> connection from
> > >>>> gfs02b.corvidtec.com-27190-2015/02/03-19:15:53:458467-homegfs-client-2-0-0
> > >>>> data-brick02a-homegfs.log:[2015-02-03 19:51:22.761293] I
> > >>>> [server.c:518:server_rpc_notify] 0-homegfs-server: disconnecting
> > >>>> connection from
> > >>>> gfs01a.corvidtec.com-25926-2015/02/03-19:51:02:89070-homegfs-client-2-0-0
> > >>>> data-brick02a-homegfs.log:[2015-02-03 20:54:02.772180] I
> > >>>> [server.c:518:server_rpc_notify] 0-homegfs-server: disconnecting
> > >>>> connection from
> > >>>> gfs01b.corvidtec.com-4175-2015/02/02-16:44:31:179119-homegfs-client-2-0-1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> You can 100% verify my theory if you can correlate the time on the
> > >>>> disconnects to the time that the missing files were healed.  Can you
> > >>>> have
> > >>>> a look at /var/log/glusterfs/glustershd.log?  That has all of the
> > >>>> healed
> > >>>> files + timestamps, if we can see a disconnect during the rsync and a
> > >>>> self
> > >>>> heal of the missing file I think we can safely assume that the
> > >>>> disconnects
> > >>>> may have caused this.  I'll try this on my test systems, how much data
> > >>>> did
> > >>>> you rsync?  What size ish of files / an idea of the dir layout?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> @Pranith - Could bricks flapping up and down during the rsync cause
> > >>>> the
> > >>>> files to be missing on the first ls(written to 1 subvol but not the
> > >>>> other
> > >>>> cause it was down), the ls triggered SH, and thats why the files were
> > >>>> there for the second ls be a possible cause here?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -b
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Pranith
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Pranith
> > >>>>>>> On 02/05/2015 03:44 PM, Xavier Hernandez wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Is the failure repeatable ? with the same directories ?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> It's very weird that the directories appear on the volume when you
> > >>>>>>> do
> > >>>>>>> an 'ls' on the bricks. Could it be that you only made a single 'ls'
> > >>>>>>> on fuse mount which not showed the directory ? Is it possible that
> > >>>>>>> this 'ls' triggered a self-heal that repaired the problem, whatever
> > >>>>>>> it was, and when you did another 'ls' on the fuse mount after the
> > >>>>>>> 'ls' on the bricks, the directories were there ?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The first 'ls' could have healed the files, causing that the
> > >>>>>>> following 'ls' on the bricks showed the files as if nothing were
> > >>>>>>> damaged. If that's the case, it's possible that there were some
> > >>>>>>> disconnections during the copy.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Added Pranith because he knows better replication and self-heal
> > >>>>>>> details.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Xavi
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 02/04/2015 07:23 PM, David F. Robinson wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> Distributed/replicated
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Volume Name: homegfs
> > >>>>>>>> Type: Distributed-Replicate
> > >>>>>>>> Volume ID: 1e32672a-f1b7-4b58-ba94-58c085e59071
> > >>>>>>>> Status: Started
> > >>>>>>>> Number of Bricks: 4 x 2 = 8
> > >>>>>>>> Transport-type: tcp
> > >>>>>>>> Bricks:
> > >>>>>>>> Brick1: gfsib01a.corvidtec.com:/data/brick01a/homegfs
> > >>>>>>>> Brick2: gfsib01b.corvidtec.com:/data/brick01b/homegfs
> > >>>>>>>> Brick3: gfsib01a.corvidtec.com:/data/brick02a/homegfs
> > >>>>>>>> Brick4: gfsib01b.corvidtec.com:/data/brick02b/homegfs
> > >>>>>>>> Brick5: gfsib02a.corvidtec.com:/data/brick01a/homegfs
> > >>>>>>>> Brick6: gfsib02b.corvidtec.com:/data/brick01b/homegfs
> > >>>>>>>> Brick7: gfsib02a.corvidtec.com:/data/brick02a/homegfs
> > >>>>>>>> Brick8: gfsib02b.corvidtec.com:/data/brick02b/homegfs
> > >>>>>>>> Options Reconfigured:
> > >>>>>>>> performance.io-thread-count: 32
> > >>>>>>>> performance.cache-size: 128MB
> > >>>>>>>> performance.write-behind-window-size: 128MB
> > >>>>>>>> server.allow-insecure: on
> > >>>>>>>> network.ping-timeout: 10
> > >>>>>>>> storage.owner-gid: 100
> > >>>>>>>> geo-replication.indexing: off
> > >>>>>>>> geo-replication.ignore-pid-check: on
> > >>>>>>>> changelog.changelog: on
> > >>>>>>>> changelog.fsync-interval: 3
> > >>>>>>>> changelog.rollover-time: 15
> > >>>>>>>> server.manage-gids: on
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> ------ Original Message ------
> > >>>>>>>> From: "Xavier Hernandez" <xhernandez at datalab.es>
> > >>>>>>>> To: "David F. Robinson" <david.robinson at corvidtec.com>; "Benjamin
> > >>>>>>>> Turner" <bennyturns at gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>> Cc: "gluster-users at gluster.org" <gluster-users at gluster.org>;
> > >>>>>>>> "Gluster
> > >>>>>>>> Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> > >>>>>>>> Sent: 2/4/2015 6:03:45 AM
> > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] missing files
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On 02/04/2015 01:30 AM, David F. Robinson wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>> Sorry. Thought about this a little more. I should have been
> > >>>>>>>>>> clearer.
> > >>>>>>>>>> The files were on both bricks of the replica, not just one side.
> > >>>>>>>>>> So,
> > >>>>>>>>>> both bricks had to have been up... The files/directories just
> > >>>>>>>>>> don't show
> > >>>>>>>>>> up on the mount.
> > >>>>>>>>>> I was reading and saw a related bug
> > >>>>>>>>>> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159484). I saw it
> > >>>>>>>>>> suggested to run:
> > >>>>>>>>>>        find <mount> -d -exec getfattr -h -n trusted.ec.heal {}
> > >>>>>>>>>>        \;
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> This command is specific for a dispersed volume. It won't do
> > >>>>>>>>> anything
> > >>>>>>>>> (aside from the error you are seeing) on a replicated volume.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I think you are using a replicated volume, right ?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> In this case I'm not sure what can be happening. Is your volume a
> > >>>>>>>>> pure
> > >>>>>>>>> replicated one or a distributed-replicated ? on a pure replicated
> > >>>>>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>> doesn't make sense that some entries do not show in an 'ls' when
> > >>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>> file is in both replicas (at least without any error message in
> > >>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>> logs). On a distributed-replicated it could be caused by some
> > >>>>>>>>> problem
> > >>>>>>>>> while combining contents of each replica set.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> What's the configuration of your volume ?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Xavi
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I get a bunch of errors for operation not supported:
> > >>>>>>>>>> [root at gfs02a homegfs]# find wks_backup -d -exec getfattr -h -n
> > >>>>>>>>>> trusted.ec.heal {} \;
> > >>>>>>>>>> find: warning: the -d option is deprecated; please use -depth
> > >>>>>>>>>> instead,
> > >>>>>>>>>> because the latter is a POSIX-compliant feature.
> > >>>>>>>>>> wks_backup/homer_backup/backup: trusted.ec.heal: Operation not
> > >>>>>>>>>> supported
> > >>>>>>>>>> wks_backup/homer_backup/logs/2014_05_20.log: trusted.ec.heal:
> > >>>>>>>>>> Operation
> > >>>>>>>>>> not supported
> > >>>>>>>>>> wks_backup/homer_backup/logs/2014_05_21.log: trusted.ec.heal:
> > >>>>>>>>>> Operation
> > >>>>>>>>>> not supported
> > >>>>>>>>>> wks_backup/homer_backup/logs/2014_05_18.log: trusted.ec.heal:
> > >>>>>>>>>> Operation
> > >>>>>>>>>> not supported
> > >>>>>>>>>> wks_backup/homer_backup/logs/2014_05_19.log: trusted.ec.heal:
> > >>>>>>>>>> Operation
> > >>>>>>>>>> not supported
> > >>>>>>>>>> wks_backup/homer_backup/logs/2014_05_22.log: trusted.ec.heal:
> > >>>>>>>>>> Operation
> > >>>>>>>>>> not supported
> > >>>>>>>>>> wks_backup/homer_backup/logs: trusted.ec.heal: Operation not
> > >>>>>>>>>> supported
> > >>>>>>>>>> wks_backup/homer_backup: trusted.ec.heal: Operation not
> > >>>>>>>>>> supported
> > >>>>>>>>>> ------ Original Message ------
> > >>>>>>>>>> From: "Benjamin Turner" <bennyturns at gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:bennyturns at gmail.com>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> To: "David F. Robinson" <david.robinson at corvidtec.com
> > >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:david.robinson at corvidtec.com>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org
> > >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:gluster-devel at gluster.org>>; "gluster-users at gluster.org"
> > >>>>>>>>>> <gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:gluster-users at gluster.org>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: 2/3/2015 7:12:34 PM
> > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] missing files
> > >>>>>>>>>>> It sounds to me like the files were only copied to one replica,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> werent
> > >>>>>>>>>>> there for the initial for the initial ls which triggered a self
> > >>>>>>>>>>> heal,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> and were there for the last ls because they were healed. Is
> > >>>>>>>>>>> there
> > >>>>>>>>>>> any
> > >>>>>>>>>>> chance that one of the replicas was down during the rsync? It
> > >>>>>>>>>>> could
> > >>>>>>>>>>> be that you lost a brick during copy or something like that. To
> > >>>>>>>>>>> confirm I would look for disconnects in the brick logs as well
> > >>>>>>>>>>> as
> > >>>>>>>>>>> checking glusterfshd.log to verify the missing files were
> > >>>>>>>>>>> actually
> > >>>>>>>>>>> healed.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> -b
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:37 PM, David F. Robinson
> > >>>>>>>>>>> <david.robinson at corvidtec.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:david.robinson at corvidtec.com>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   I rsync'd 20-TB over to my gluster system and noticed that I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   had
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   some directories missing even though the rsync completed
> > >>>>>>>>>>> normally.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   The rsync logs showed that the missing files were
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   transferred.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   I went to the bricks and did an 'ls -al
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   /data/brick*/homegfs/dir/*' the files were on the bricks.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> After I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   did this 'ls', the files then showed up on the FUSE mounts.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   1) Why are the files hidden on the fuse mount?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   2) Why does the ls make them show up on the FUSE mount?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   3) How can I prevent this from happening again?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   Note, I also mounted the gluster volume using NFS and saw the
> > >>>>>>>>>>> same
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   behavior. The files/directories were not shown until I did
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   "ls" on the bricks.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   David
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   ===============================
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   David F. Robinson, Ph.D.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   President - Corvid Technologies
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   704.799.6944 x101 <tel:704.799.6944%20x101> [office]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   704.252.1310 <tel:704.252.1310> [cell]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   704.799.7974 <tel:704.799.7974> [fax]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   David.Robinson at corvidtec.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:David.Robinson at corvidtec.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   http://www.corvidtechnologies.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.corvidtechnologies.com/>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   _______________________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   Gluster-devel mailing list
> > >>>>>>>>>>>   Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
> > >>>>>>>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> > >>>>>>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
> > >>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > >>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
> > >>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > >>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > >>
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 
> --
> GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org
> 
> An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
> petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.
> 
> My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift
> 
>

More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list