[Gluster-devel] Recognizing contributors and displaying other useful bits?
Niels de Vos
ndevos at redhat.com
Thu Dec 17 15:05:20 UTC 2015
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:05:04PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
> On 12/16/2015 07:36 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >Many GUI tools provide an "About" box that displays some information
> >about the project. Some applications (Wireshark for example) go an extra
> >step by including a list of all people that contributed patches. That is
> >quite a nice way for contributors to see the appreciation of their work.
> >I think it would be really awesome if we could do something similar. We
> >have our reserved+hidden ".glusterfs" directory where all access is
> >denied. We could populate this directory with static compiled-in
> >contents. When accessed from a client, the licenses, versions, authors
> >and other bits could be displayed. A normal readdir should still not
> >list the directory at all (no change from current behaviour).
> >Any thoughts?
> I think It would be better to revive the who-wrote-glusterfs reports that
> Vijay used to send on the mailing list instead of statically adding
> contributor names to code.
Well, I would like to see an AUTHORS list automatically generated by
'make dist' or the such.
> We could have a `gluster --credits` or `gluster--help` cli that points to
> gluster.org and maybe add a button thingy on the website which when clicked
> runs the who-wrote-glusterfs.sh on <whatever-branch> and displays the
> result. Things like version numbers and licenses are/should be covered in
I think it would be nice to be able to see some information through a
client mount point. Not everyone that uses Gluster has access to the
storage servers, and it can benefit them to see some info.
> But yes, if we do want to expose this information via the mount point, then
> maybe /mount/.meta is a good place.
Indeed, .meta would be better :)
> My 2 cents.
> >Gluster-devel mailing list
> >Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> > : Any porters out there should feel happier knowing that DEC is shipping >
> : me an AlphaPC that I intend to try getting linux running on: this will > :
> definitely help flush out some of the most flagrant unportable stuff. > :
> The Alpha is much more different from the i386 than the 68k stuff is, so > :
> it's likely to get most of the stuff fixed. > > It's posts like this that
> almost convince us non-believers that there > really is a god. (A follow-up
> by alovell at kerberos.demon.co.uk, Anthony Lovell, to Linus's remarks about
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Gluster-devel