[Gluster-devel] Gluster testing matrix

[Deepak Shetty]

Where / How do you indicate whether the underlying GlusterFS is used/tested
using fusemount or libgfapi method or both ?

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Raghavendra Talur <rtalur at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Here is a table representing the current state of Gluster testing.
>
> * Things in green are categories for which we have some kind of testing in
> place.
> * Things in red are the ones which don't have any tests.
> * Things in yellow are the ones which have no known tests or are not
> managed by Gluster community.
>
>
>
> Test Category/Sub-Category
>
>
>
>
>
> smoke source build + Posix complaince + Dbench
>
>
>
>
> functional tests/basic
>
>
>
>
> regression tests/bugs
>
>
>
>
> performance regression N/A
>
>
>
>
> integration Backends/FS Protocols Consumers/Cloud Environments Tools libgfapi
> bindings OS environment xfs smb qemu gdeploy java firewalld ext4 nfs
> openstack/cinder heketi python ufw btrfs swift openshift/docker/containers
> ruby selinux zfs
> aws
> go apparmor
>
> azure
>
>
>
>
> hadoop
>
>
> update major version upgrades minor version upgrades
>
>
>
> longevity a. memory leaks
> b. log accumulation
>
>
>
>
> distro packaging a. pkg build + smoke
> b. sysvinit/systemd
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I will send separate mails for each of the categories above highlighting
> plans for them.
>
> Use this thread to indicate addition/deletion/changes to this matrix.
> We will put this at gluster.org website once it is final.
>
> Thanks,
> Raghavendra Talur & MSV Bhat
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20151217/c2340f86/attachment.html>