[Gluster-devel] Rebalance improvement design
Susant Palai
spalai at redhat.com
Tue Apr 7 09:38:25 UTC 2015
Here is one test performed on a 300GB data set and around 100%(1/2 the time) improvement was seen.
[root at gprfs031 ~]# gluster v i
Volume Name: rbperf
Type: Distribute
Volume ID: 35562662-337e-4923-b862-d0bbb0748003
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 4
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: gprfs029-10ge:/bricks/gprfs029/brick1
Brick2: gprfs030-10ge:/bricks/gprfs030/brick1
Brick3: gprfs031-10ge:/bricks/gprfs031/brick1
Brick4: gprfs032-10ge:/bricks/gprfs032/brick1
Added server 32 and started rebalance force.
Rebalance stat for new changes:
[root at gprfs031 ~]# gluster v rebalance rbperf status
Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in secs
--------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ --------------
localhost 74639 36.1GB 297319 0 0 completed 1743.00
172.17.40.30 67512 33.5GB 269187 0 0 completed 1395.00
gprfs029-10ge 79095 38.8GB 284105 0 0 completed 1559.00
gprfs032-10ge 0 0Bytes 0 0 0 completed 402.00
volume rebalance: rbperf: success:
Rebalance stat for old model:
[root at gprfs031 ~]# gluster v rebalance rbperf status
Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in secs
--------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ --------------
localhost 86493 42.0GB 634302 0 0 completed 3329.00
gprfs029-10ge 94115 46.2GB 687852 0 0 completed 3328.00
gprfs030-10ge 74314 35.9GB 651943 0 0 completed 3072.00
gprfs032-10ge 0 0Bytes 594166 0 0 completed 1943.00
volume rebalance: rbperf: success:
Best regards,
Susant
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vijay Bellur" <vbellur at redhat.com>
To: "Susant Palai" <spalai at redhat.com>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
Sent: Monday, 6 April, 2015 7:39:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance improvement design
On 03/31/2015 01:49 PM, Susant Palai wrote:
> Hi,
> Posted patch for rebalance improvement here: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9657/ .
> You can find the feature page here: http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features/improve_rebalance_performance
>
> The current patch address two part of the design proposed.
> 1. Rebalance multiple files in parallel
> 2. Crawl only bricks that belong to the current node
>
> Brief design explanation for the above two points.
>
> 1. Rebalance multiple files in parallel:
> -------------------------------------
>
> The existing rebalance engine is single threaded. Hence, introduced multiple threads which will be running parallel to the crawler.
> The current rebalance migration is converted to a "Producer-Consumer" frame work.
> Where Producer is : Crawler
> Consumer is : Migrating Threads
>
> Crawler: Crawler is the main thread. The job of the crawler is now limited to fix-layout of each directory and add the files
> which are eligible for the migration to a global queue. Hence, the crawler will not be "blocked" by migration process.
>
> Producer: Producer will monitor the global queue. If any file is added to this queue, it will dqueue that entry and migrate the file.
> Currently 15 migration threads are spawned at the beginning of the rebalance process. Hence, multiple file migration
> happens in parallel.
>
>
> 2. Crawl only bricks that belong to the current node:
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> As rebalance process is spawned per node, it migrates only the files that belongs to it's own node for the sake of load
> balancing. But it also reads entries from the whole cluster, which is not necessary as readdir hits other nodes.
>
> New Design:
> As part of the new design the rebalancer decides the subvols that are local to the rebalancer node by checking the node-uuid of
> root directory prior to the crawler starts. Hence, readdir won't hit the whole cluster as it has already the context of
> local subvols and also node-uuid request for each file can be avoided. This makes the rebalance process "more scalable".
>
>
The approaches outlined do look good.
Do you have rebalance comparison numbers before and after this patchset?
Thanks,
Vijay
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list