[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Proposal for GlusterD-2.0

James purpleidea at gmail.com
Thu Sep 11 17:55:17 UTC 2014

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Krishnan Parthasarathi
<kparthas at redhat.com> wrote:
> I think using Salt as the orchestration framework is a good idea.
> We would still need to have a consistent distributed store. I hope
> Salt has the provision to use one of our choice. It could be consul
> or something that satisfies the criteria for choosing alternate technology.
> I would wait for a couple of days for the community to chew on this and
> share their thoughts. If we have a consensus on this, we could 'port'
> the 'basic'[1] volume management commands to a system built using Salt and
> see for real how it fits our use case. Thoughts?

I disagree. I think puppet + puppet-gluster would be a good idea :)
One advantage is that the technology is already proven, and there's a
working POC.
Feel free to prove me wrong, or to request any features that it's missing. ;)

More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list