[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Proposal for GlusterD-2.0

[mike]

That's disappointing. I can certainly understand wanting to keep dependencies small, but that sounds like FUD more than a reasoned argument.

I do not envy your position navigating such waters.

On Sep 8, 2014, at 2:38 PM, Jeff Darcy <jdarcy at redhat.com> wrote:

>> Is there any reason not to consider zookeeper?
> 
> I did bring up that idea a while ago.  I'm no Java fan myself, but still
> I was surprised by the vehemence of the reactions.  To put it politely,
> many seemed to consider the dependency on Java unacceptable for both
> resource and security reasons.  Some community members said that they'd
> be forced to switch to another DFS if we went that way.  It didn't seem
> like a very promising direction to explore further.