[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Proposal for GlusterD-2.0
kparthas at redhat.com
Mon Sep 8 05:52:24 UTC 2014
----- Original Message -----
> > As part of the first phase, we aim to delegate the distributed
> > configuration
> > store. We are exploring consul  as a replacement for the existing
> > distributed configuration store (sum total of /var/lib/glusterd/* across
> > all
> > nodes). Consul provides distributed configuration store which is consistent
> > and partition tolerant. By moving all Gluster related configuration
> > information into consul we could avoid split-brain situations.
> Overall, I like the idea. But I think you knew that. ;)
Thanks. I am glad you like it :-)
> Is the idea to run consul on all nodes as we do with glusterd, or to run
> it only on a few nodes (similar to Ceph's mon cluster) and then use them
> to coordinate membership etc. for the rest?
It is not set in stone, but I think we should have consul running only on
a subset of the nodes in the cluster, similar to Ceph's mon cluster approach.
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
More information about the Gluster-devel