[Gluster-devel] Gluster Test Framwork tests failed on Gluster+Zfs(Zfs on linux)

[Santosh Pradhan]

Hi,
Currently GlusterFS is tightly coupled with ext(2/3/4) and XFS. Zfs 
(ZOL) and Btrfs are not supported at the moment, may get supported in 
future (at least btrfs).

Thanks,
Santosh


On 09/04/2014 03:34 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 28/08/2014, at 9:30 AM, Kiran Patil wrote:
>> Hi Gluster Devs,
>>
>> I ran the Gluster Test Framework on Gluster+zfs stack and found issues.
>>
>> I would like to know if I need to submit a bug at Redhat Bugzilla since the stack has zfs, which is not supported by Redhat or Fedora if I am not wrong?
> Definitely create an issue on the Red Hat Bugzilla, for the "GlusterFS"
> "product" ;> there:
>
>    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=GlusterFS
>
> Since it's for the upstream Community, the official Red Hat "Supported"
> list isn't super relevant.
>
>
> <snip>
>> Test Summary Report
>> -------------------
>> ./tests/basic/quota.t                           (Wstat: 0 Tests: 45 Failed: 3) --> quota issue
>>    Failed tests:  24, 28, 32
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-1004744.t                      (Wstat: 0 Tests: 14 Failed: 4) --> passes on changing EXPECT_WITHIN 20 to EXPECT_WITHIN 30
>>    Failed tests:  10, 12-14
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-1023974.t                      (Wstat: 0 Tests: 15 Failed: 1) --> quota issue
>>    Failed test:  12
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-824753.t                       (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 1) --> file-locker issue
>>    Failed test:  11
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-856455.t                       (Wstat: 0 Tests: 8 Failed: 1) --> brick directory name is hardcoded while executing kill command
>>    Failed test:  8
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-860663.t                       (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 1) --> brick directory name is hardcoded and failed at TEST ! touch $M0/files{1..10000};
>>    Failed test:  8
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-861542.t                       (Wstat: 0 Tests: 13 Failed: 4) --> brick directory name is hardcoded and all EXPECT tests are failing
>>    Failed tests:  10-13
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-902610.t                       (Wstat: 0 Tests: 8 Failed: 1) --> brick directory name is hardcoded and EXPECT test failing
>>    Failed test:  8
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-948729/bug-948729-force.t      (Wstat: 0 Tests: 35 Failed: 4) --> XFS related and brick directory name is hardcoded
>>    Failed tests:  15, 17, 19, 21
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-948729/bug-948729-mode-script.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 35 Failed: 8) --> XFS related and brick directory name is hardcoded
>>    Failed tests:  15, 17, 19, 21, 24-27
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-948729/bug-948729.t            (Wstat: 0 Tests: 23 Failed: 3) --> XFS related and brick directory name is hardcoded
>>    Failed tests:  12, 15, 23
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-963541.t                       (Wstat: 0 Tests: 13 Failed: 3) --> remove-brick issue
>>    Failed tests:  8-9, 13
>> ./tests/features/glupy.t                        (Wstat: 0 Tests: 6 Failed: 2)
>>    Failed tests:  2, 6
>>
>> Subset of the above bugs which can be reproduced on Glusterfs + ext4 is filed at Redhat bugzilla which is Bug id 1132496.
> The glupy.t one I'll be able to look at, but not in the next few days.  I need
> to finish my current task, and then to get my head back into Glupy.
>
> bug-1004744.t and the tests with hard coded brick directory names may be easy
> to fix.  The others I'm not sure about.
>
> Do you have any interest in creating the fixes for the one's you're
> comfortable with, and submitting them through Gerrit? (review.gluster.org)
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
>
> --
> GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org
>
> An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
> petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.
>
> My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel