[Gluster-devel] Regression testing report: Gluster v3.6.1 on CentOS 6.6
Pranith Kumar Karampuri
pkarampu at redhat.com
Wed Nov 12 12:43:43 UTC 2014
On 11/11/2014 05:25 PM, Kiran Patil wrote:
> I have installed gluster v3.6.1 from
> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/EPEL.repo/epel-6/
>
>
> The /tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t testcase passed in all 3 runs and rest
> of the two tests quota-anon-fd-nfs.t,
> /tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t failed in all 3 runs.
Thanks for this mail Kiran. http://review.gluster.org/8201 will fix
/tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t
CCed vijaikumar to look into the quota-anon-fd-nfs.t
Pranith
>
> Ondisk filesystem is ext4.
>
> Thanks for quick feedback.
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
> <pkarampu at redhat.com <mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/11/2014 03:13 PM, Kiran Patil wrote:
>> Test Summary Report
>> ------------------------------
>> ./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 1)
>> Failed test: 16
> This is a spurious failure at least on master. Could you run it
> 2-3 times to see if it is a consistent failure on cent-os.
>> ./tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 30
>> Failed: 2)
>> Failed tests: 10, 24
> What is the underlying backend filesystem?
>> ./tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 11 Failed: 2)
>> Failed tests: 9, 11
> CC Joseph fernandez
>> Files=277, Tests=7908, 8046 wallclock secs ( 4.54 usr 0.98 sys +
>> 902.74 cusr 644.05 csys = 1552.31 CPU)
>> Result: FAIL
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20141112/3176ef9e/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list