[Gluster-devel] Regression testing report: Gluster v3.6.1 on CentOS 6.6

[Pranith Kumar Karampuri]

On 11/11/2014 05:25 PM, Kiran Patil wrote:
> I have installed gluster v3.6.1 from 
> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/EPEL.repo/epel-6/ 
>
>
> The /tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t testcase passed in all 3 runs and rest 
> of the two tests quota-anon-fd-nfs.t, 
> /tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t failed in all 3 runs.
Thanks for this mail Kiran. http://review.gluster.org/8201 will fix 
/tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t

CCed vijaikumar to look into the quota-anon-fd-nfs.t

Pranith
>
> Ondisk filesystem is ext4.
>
> Thanks for quick feedback.
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri 
> <pkarampu at redhat.com <mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     On 11/11/2014 03:13 PM, Kiran Patil wrote:
>>     Test Summary Report
>>     ------------------------------
>>     ./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t    (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 1)
>>       Failed test:  16
>     This is a spurious failure at least on master. Could you run it
>     2-3 times to see if it is a consistent failure on cent-os.
>>     ./tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t     (Wstat: 0 Tests: 30
>>     Failed: 2)
>>       Failed tests:  10, 24
>     What is the underlying backend filesystem?
>>     ./tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t     (Wstat: 0 Tests: 11 Failed: 2)
>>       Failed tests:  9, 11
>     CC Joseph fernandez
>>     Files=277, Tests=7908, 8046 wallclock secs ( 4.54 usr  0.98 sys +
>>     902.74 cusr 644.05 csys = 1552.31 CPU)
>>     Result: FAIL
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Gluster-devel mailing list
>>     Gluster-devel at gluster.org  <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>>     http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20141112/3176ef9e/attachment.html>