[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] glusterfs crashed lead by liblvm2app.so with BD xlator

[Vijay Bellur]

On 11/08/2014 03:50 PM, Jaden Liang wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We are testing BD xlator to verify the KVM running with gluster. After some
> simple tests, we encountered a coredump of glusterfs lead by liblvm2app.so.
> Hope some one here might give some advises about this issue.
>
> We have debug for some time, and found out this coredump is triggered by a
> thread-safe issue. From the core file, the top function is _update_mda()
> with a invailid pointer which is from lvmcache_foreach_mda(). As we
> know, the glusterfsd
> has some io threads to simulate the async io. That will make more than 1
> thread run into
> bd_statfs_cbk(). And in liblvm2app.so, _text_read() will look up an info
> in a hash
> table named _pvid_hash. If no info item exist, it will allocate a new
> one. However,
> there isn't any lock to protect this operations! liblvm2app.so will get
> crashed with
> multi-thread like this precedures:
>
> Thread A and thread B go into bd_statfs_cbk() at the same time:
> 1. A allocate an new info node, and put it into _pvid_hash, call
> lvmcache_foreach_mda().
> 2. B looks up and get the info generaed by A in _pvid_hash, pass it to
> lvmcache_del_mdas(), this will free the info node.
> 3. A keep using the info node which has been freed by B.
> 4. Memory crash...
>

Thanks for the report and the steps to recreate the problem.

> #9  0x00007f83b599753f in _lvm_vg_open (mode=0x7f83b5c8971e "r",
> vgname=0x11d2c50 "bd-vg", libh=0x11d3c40,
>      flags=<optimized out>) at lvm_vg.c:221
> #10 lvm_vg_open (libh=0x11d3c40, vgname=0x11d2c50 "bd-vg",
> mode=mode at entry=0x7f83b5c8971e "r", flags=flags at entry=0)
>      at lvm_vg.c:238
> #11 0x00007f83b5c7ee36 in bd_statfs_cbk (frame=0x7f83b95416e4,
> cookie=<optimized out>, this=0x119eb90, op_ret=0, op_errno=0,
>      buff=0x7f83b1d0ac70, xdata=0x0) at bd.c:353


One quick fix would be to serialize calls to lvm_vg_open() by holding a 
lock in bd xlator. Have you tried attempting that?

-Vijay