[Gluster-devel] Shall we revert quota-anon-fd.t?
Pranith Kumar Karampuri
pkarampu at redhat.com
Wed Jun 11 05:48:33 UTC 2014
On 06/11/2014 10:45 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>
> On 06/11/2014 09:45 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>> On 06/11/2014 08:21 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>>> hi,
>>> I see that quota-anon-fd.t is causing too many spurious failures. I
>>> think we should revert it and raise a bug so that it can be fixed and
>>> committed again along with the fix.
>>>
>>
>> I think we can do that. The problem here is stemming from the issue
>> that nfs can deadlock when we have client and servers on the same
>> node with system memory utilization being on the higher side. We also
>> need to look into other nfs tests to determine if there are similar
>> possibilities.
>
> I doubt it is because of that, there are so many nfs mount tests, only
> this one keeps failing for the past 2-3 days.
> http://review.gluster.org/8031 reverts this test.
More tests are failing because of this test. To give this patch more
priority, shall I remove the remaining builds for regression and start a
run for this and then add the removed ones back again after this one?
Let me know your thoughts.
Pranith
>
> Pranith
>>
>> -Vijay
>>
>
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list