[Gluster-devel] Shall we revert quota-anon-fd.t?

Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkarampu at redhat.com
Wed Jun 11 05:48:33 UTC 2014


On 06/11/2014 10:45 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>
> On 06/11/2014 09:45 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>> On 06/11/2014 08:21 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>>> hi,
>>>     I see that quota-anon-fd.t is causing too many spurious failures. I
>>> think we should revert it and raise a bug so that it can be fixed and
>>> committed again along with the fix.
>>>
>>
>> I think we can do that. The problem here is stemming from the issue 
>> that nfs can deadlock when we have client and servers on the same 
>> node with system memory utilization being on the higher side. We also 
>> need to look into other nfs tests to determine if there are similar 
>> possibilities.
>
> I doubt it is because of that, there are so many nfs mount tests, only 
> this one keeps failing for the past 2-3 days.
> http://review.gluster.org/8031 reverts this test.
More tests are failing because of this test. To give this patch more 
priority, shall I remove the remaining builds for regression and start a 
run for this and then add the removed ones back again after this one?

Let me know your thoughts.

Pranith
>
> Pranith
>>
>> -Vijay
>>
>



More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list