[Gluster-devel] Cmockery2 in GlusterFS
Lalatendu Mohanty
lmohanty at redhat.com
Tue Jul 22 11:34:06 UTC 2014
On 07/22/2014 04:35 PM, Luis Pabón wrote:
> I understand that when something is new and different, it is most
> likely blamed for anything wrong that happens. I highly propose that
> we do not do this, and instead work to learn more about the tool.
>
> Cmockery2 is a tool that is important as the compiler. It provides an
> extremely easy method to determine the quality of the software after
> it has been constructed, and therefore it has been made to be a
> requirement of the build. Making it optional undermines its
> importance, and could in turn make it useless.
>
Hey Luis,
Th intention was not to undermine or give less importance to Cmockery2.
Sorry if it looked like that.
However I was thinking from a flexibility point of view. I am assuming
in future, it would be part of upstream regression test suite. So each
patch will go through full unit testing by-default. So when somebody is
creating RPMs from pristine sources, we should be able to do that
without Cmockery2 because the tests were already ran through
Jenkins/gerrit.
The question is do we need Cmockery every-time we compile glusterfs
source? if the answer is yes, then I am fine with current code.
> Cmockery2 is available for all supported EPEL/Fedora versions. For
> any other distribution or operating system, it takes about 3 mins to
> download and compile.
>
> Please let me know if you have any other questions.
>
> - Luis
>
> On 07/22/2014 02:23 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
>> On 07/21/2014 10:48 PM, Harshavardhana wrote:
>>> Cmockery2 is a hard dependency before GlusterFS can be compiled in
>>> upstream master now - we could make it conditional
>>> and enable if necessary? since we know we do not have the cmockery2
>>> packages available on all systems?
>>
>> +1, we need to make it conditional and enable it if necessary. I am
>> also not sure if we have "cmockery2-devel" in el5, el6. If not Build
>> will fail.
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Luis Pabon <lpabon at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> Niels you are correct. Let me take a look.
>>>>
>>>> Luis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Niels de Vos [ndevos at redhat.com]
>>>> Received: Monday, 21 Jul 2014, 10:41AM
>>>> To: Luis Pabon [lpabon at redhat.com]
>>>> CC: Anders Blomdell [anders.blomdell at control.lth.se];
>>>> gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Cmockery2 in GlusterFS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 04:27:18PM +0200, Anders Blomdell wrote:
>>>>> On 2014-07-21 16:17, Anders Blomdell wrote:
>>>>>> On 2014-07-20 16:01, Niels de Vos wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 02:52:18PM -0400, Luis Pabón wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>> A few months ago, the unit test framework based on
>>>>>>>> cmockery2 was
>>>>>>>> in the repo for a little while, then removed while we improved the
>>>>>>>> packaging method. Now support for cmockery2 (
>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/7538/ ) has been merged into the
>>>>>>>> repo
>>>>>>>> again. This will most likely require you to install cmockery2 on
>>>>>>>> your development systems by doing the following:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Fedora/EPEL:
>>>>>>>> $ sudo yum -y install cmockery2-devel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * All other systems please visit the following page:
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/lpabon/cmockery2/blob/master/doc/usage.md#installation
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here is also some information about Cmockery2 and how to use it:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Introduction to Unit Tests in C Presentation:
>>>>>>>> http://slides-lpabon.rhcloud.com/feb24_glusterfs_unittest.html#/
>>>>>>>> * Cmockery2 Usage Guide:
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/lpabon/cmockery2/blob/master/doc/usage.md
>>>>>>>> * Using Cmockery2 with GlusterFS:
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/doc/hacker-guide/en-US/markdown/unittest.md
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When starting out writing unit tests, I would suggest writing unit
>>>>>>>> tests for non-xlator interface files when you start. Once you feel
>>>>>>>> more comfortable writing unit tests, then move to writing them for
>>>>>>>> the xlators interface files.
>>>>>>> Awesome, many thanks! I'd like to add some unittests for the RPC
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> NFS
>>>>>>> layer. Several functions (like ip-address/netmask matching for
>>>>>>> ACLs)
>>>>>>> look very suitable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Did you have any particular functions in mind that you would
>>>>>>> like to
>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>> unittests for? If so, maybe you can file some bugs for the
>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>> tests so that we won't forget about it? Depending on the tests,
>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>> bugs may get the EasyFix keyword if there is a clear description
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> some pointers to examples.
>>>>>> Looks like parts of cmockery was forgotten in glusterfs.spec.in:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # rpm -q -f `which gluster`
>>>>>> glusterfs-cli-3.7dev-0.9.git5b8de97.fc20.x86_64
>>>>>> # ldd `which gluster`
>>>>>> linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffff4dfe000)
>>>>>> libglusterfs.so.0 => /lib64/libglusterfs.so.0
>>>>>> (0x00007fe034cc4000)
>>>>>> libreadline.so.6 => /lib64/libreadline.so.6
>>>>>> (0x00007fe034a7d000)
>>>>>> libncurses.so.5 => /lib64/libncurses.so.5 (0x00007fe034856000)
>>>>>> libtinfo.so.5 => /lib64/libtinfo.so.5 (0x00007fe03462c000)
>>>>>> libgfxdr.so.0 => /lib64/libgfxdr.so.0 (0x00007fe034414000)
>>>>>> libgfrpc.so.0 => /lib64/libgfrpc.so.0 (0x00007fe0341f8000)
>>>>>> libxml2.so.2 => /lib64/libxml2.so.2 (0x00007fe033e8f000)
>>>>>> libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007fe033c79000)
>>>>>> libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007fe033971000)
>>>>>> libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fe03376d000)
>>>>>> libcmockery.so.0 => not found
>>>>>> libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fe03354f000)
>>>>>> libcrypto.so.10 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.10 (0x00007fe033168000)
>>>>>> libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fe032da9000)
>>>>>> libcmockery.so.0 => not found
>>>>>> libcmockery.so.0 => not found
>>>>>> libcmockery.so.0 => not found
>>>>>> liblzma.so.5 => /lib64/liblzma.so.5 (0x00007fe032b82000)
>>>>>> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fe0351f1000)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should I file a bug report or could someone on the fast-lane fix
>>>>>> this?
>>>>> My bad (installation with --nodeps --force :-()
>>>> Actually, I was not expecting a dependency on cmockery2. My
>>>> understanding was that only some temporary test-applications would be
>>>> linked with libcmockery and not any binaries that would get
>>>> packaged in
>>>> the RPMs.
>>>>
>>>> Luis, could you clarify that?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Niels
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20140722/547f0aae/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list