[Gluster-devel] regarding spurious failure tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t

[Avra Sengupta]

In the test case, we are checking gluster snap status to see if all the 
bricks are alive. One of the snap bricks fail to start up, and hence we 
see the failure. The brick fails to bind with "Address already in use" 
error. But if we see clearly that same log also says "binding to  
failed", where the address is missing. So it might be trying to bind to 
the wrong(or empty) address.

Following are the brick logs for the same:

[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662573] I 
[rpcsvc.c:2142:rpcsvc_set_outstanding_rpc_limit] 0-rpc-service: 
Configured rpc.outstanding-rpc-limit with value 64
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662634] W [options.c:898:xl_opt_validate] 
0-ad94478591fc41648c9674b10143e3d2-server: option 'listen-port' is 
deprecated, preferred is 'transport.socket.listen-port', continuing with 
correction
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662758] E [socket.c:710:__socket_server_bind] 
0-tcp.ad94478591fc41648c9674b10143e3d2-server: binding to  failed: 
Address already in use
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662776] E [socket.c:713:__socket_server_bind] 
0-tcp.ad94478591fc41648c9674b10143e3d2-server: Port is already in use
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662795] W [rpcsvc.c:1531:rpcsvc_transport_create] 
0-rpc-service: listening on transport failed
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662810] W [server.c:920:init] 
0-ad94478591fc41648c9674b10143e3d2-server: creation of listener failed
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662821] E [xlator.c:425:xlator_init] 
0-ad94478591fc41648c9674b10143e3d2-server: Initialization of volume 
'ad94478591fc41648c9674b10143e3d2-server' failed, review your volfile again
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662836] E [graph.c:322:glusterfs_graph_init] 
0-ad94478591fc41648c9674b10143e3d2-server: initializing translator failed
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662847] E [graph.c:525:glusterfs_graph_activate] 
0-graph: init failed
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.664283] W [glusterfsd.c:1182:cleanup_and_exit] (--> 
0-: received signum (0), shutting down

Regards,
Avra

On 07/08/2014 11:28 AM, Joseph Fernandes wrote:
> Hi Pranith,
>
> I am looking into this issue. Will keep you posted on the process by EOD
>
> Regards,
> ~Joe
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com>
> To: josferna at redhat.com
> Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>, "Rajesh Joseph" <rjoseph at redhat.com>, "Sachin Pandit" <spandit at redhat.com>, asengupt at redhat.com
> Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 8:42:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] regarding spurious failure tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t
>
>
> On 07/07/2014 06:18 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>> Joseph,
>>      Any updates on this? It failed 5 regressions today.
>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB/541/consoleFull
>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/175/consoleFull
>>
>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/173/consoleFull
>>
>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/166/consoleFull
>>
>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/172/consoleFull
>>
> One more : http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB/543/console
>
> Pranith
>
>> CC some more folks who work on snapshot.
>>
>> Pranith
>>
>> On 07/05/2014 11:19 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>>> hi Joseph,
>>>      The test above failed on a documentation patch, so it has got to
>>> be a spurious failure.
>>> Check
>>> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/150/consoleFull
>>> for more information
>>>
>>> Pranith
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel