[Gluster-devel] question on glustershd
Krutika Dhananjay
kdhananj at redhat.com
Fri Dec 5 11:17:42 UTC 2014
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Emmanuel Dreyfus" <manu at netbsd.org>
> To: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Emmanuel Dreyfus" <manu at netbsd.org>, "Gluster Devel"
> <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 5, 2014 4:42:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] question on glustershd
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 04:28:49AM -0500, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
> > Here's the patch I was talking about: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9240/1
> Unfortunately it does not fix entry-self-heal.t which still fails at the
> same place. I wonder if the same change should not be done also on inode
> lock attempts that are done in data and entry heal code.
Could you provide the trace logs you had added with this failure?
-Krutika
> OTOH, it seems to have fixed self-heald.t which suffered a similar problem
> on the test commented as "Test that ongoing IO is not considered as
> Pending heal"
> I have to test a bit more to be sure.
> --
> Emmanuel Dreyfus
> manu at netbsd.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20141205/9b518585/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list