[Gluster-devel] question on glustershd

[Krutika Dhananjay]

Emmanuel, 

We (AFR team) had a discussion about this and came to the conclusion that the code doing tryinodelk()s in metadata self-heal can be safely removed, for which I will be sending a patch. 

With this patch (once it is out), could you run this test a couple of times again and let us know if the inodelk collision logs are still appearing? 

-Krutika 

----- Original Message -----

> From: "Emmanuel Dreyfus" <manu at netbsd.org>
> To: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 3:15:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] question on glustershd

> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 04:02:13AM -0500, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
> > What was the test that led to this?

> In tests/basic/afr/entry-self-heal.t the print_pending_heals test line 258
> spots the problem. It always report spb_heal spb_me_heal.

> --
> Emmanuel Dreyfus
> manu at netbsd.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20141203/fbebd542/attachment.html>