[Gluster-devel] Spurious regression of tests/basic/mgmt_v3-locks.t

Ravishankar N ravishankar at redhat.com
Mon Dec 1 16:12:09 UTC 2014


On 11/13/2014 12:11 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/09/2014 10:31 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/08/2014 05:21 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
>>> On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:58:06 +0530
>>> Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>> Can there be any cases where glusterd instance may go down
>>>> unexpectedly without a crash?
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered
>>>> /2319/consoleFull
>>>
>>> Has anyone gotten back to you about this?
>>>
>> Not yet :(
>>
>> ~Atin
> Though we don't have the exact clue why the first glusterd instance
> stopped responding, but looking at the current test case I attempted to
> make this more safe in terms of cli failures in
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9114/
> 
> Also currently we do not have per instance cli log file unlike we have
> for glusterd in cluster setup. http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9100/
> should ensure cli.log files are created per cli instances.
> 
> ~Atin


I see the mgmt locks spurious-failure-fix patches referenced above have been merged but I am still able to hit it on master.
In case some motivated soul wants to have a look, here is the log: http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/2961/consoleFull


>>> + Justin
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 



More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list