[Gluster-devel] glusterfs-3.5.0beta4 released

[Emmanuel Dreyfus]

Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> wrote:

> Does look like most of the memory consumption in here is coming from 
> inode_ctx allocations across translators. This certainly seems to point
> towards a missing inode_unref().

Is it possible that it could be linked with the FUSE implementation?
 
> I assume that you have eager locks set to off by default in your 
> testing. Apart from this, are there other volume configuration changes?

Just memory statistics.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu at netbsd.org