[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] glusterfs-3.4.1qa2 released

[Anand Avati]

Can you please confirm if http://review.gluster.org/5979 fixes the problem
of #998967 for you? If so we will backport and include the patch in 3.4.1.

Thanks,
Avati


On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Anand Avati <avati at gluster.org> wrote:

> I have a theory for #998967 (that posix-acl is not doing the right thing
> after chmod/setattr). Preparing a patch, will appreciate if you can test it
> quickly.
>
> Avati
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Lukáš Bezdička <
> lukas.bezdicka at gooddata.com> wrote:
>
>> No, I see issues reported in
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998967 which is probably
>> related to BZ#991035.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/18/2013 02:45 PM, Lukáš Bezdička wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tested with glusterfs-3.4.1qa2-1.el6.x86_**64 issue with ACL is still
>>>> there, unless one applies patch from http://review.gluster.org/#/c/**
>>>> 5693/ <http://review.gluster.org/#/c/5693/>
>>>> which shoots through the caches and takes ACLs from server or sets
>>>> entry-timeout=0 it returns wrong values. This is probably because ACL
>>>> mask being applied incorrectly in posix_acl_inherit_mode, but I'm no C
>>>> expert to say so :(
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Checking again. Are you seeing issues reported in both BZ#991035 and
>>> BZ#990830 with 3.4.1qa2?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vijay
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20130920/d608e650/attachment-0001.html>