[Gluster-devel] GlusterFS 3.5 planning

Anand Avati anand.avati at gmail.com
Fri Oct 4 16:42:15 UTC 2013


http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Planning35

>From the "Core Features" list, we are still waiting on quite a few
submissions (some of them even first submission). We are postponing the
branch date to 14th Oct.

I request all assigned devs to push their patches or give an update on the
progress.

Avati



On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Amar Tumballi <amarts at gmail.com> wrote:

> Set of patches I propose we take it in for release-3.5 (already passed
> regression test, and at least 1 review)
>
> Graph cleanup patches from Raghavendra Bhat (
> http://review.gluster.org/4778 and dependencies)
>
> glusterd: Calculate volume op-versions only on set/reset<http://review.gluster.org/5568>
> build: Start using library versioning for various libraries<http://review.gluster.org/5645>
> cli,glusterd: Implement 'volume status tasks'<http://review.gluster.org/6006>
> glusterd: Set errstr appropriately on peer op failure<http://review.gluster.org/5978>
> geo-rep: logrotate: Logrotate handling <http://review.gluster.org/5968>
> glusterd: Fix storing volumes on setting global opts<http://review.gluster.org/6007>
> libglusterfs: clean up for syncenv_new/destroy()<http://review.gluster.org/5838>
> mount.glusterfs: getopts support and cleanup<http://review.gluster.org/5931> -
> for man page cleanup :-)
> glusterd: Validating invalid log-level under geo-rep config options.<http://review.gluster.org/5989>
> protocol/client: Add explicit states for connection sequence<http://review.gluster.org/5956>
> protocol: add gfid to on wire format for fsetattr/rchecksum<http://review.gluster.org/3956>
> features/changelog : Improvement in changelog "encoding-change".<http://review.gluster.org/5844>
>
>
> Set of patches which would be good to have (sort of features, and also
> would need rebase if above set of patches go in)
>
> glusterfs: zerofill support <http://review.gluster.org/5327>
> cluster/afr: refactoring and cleanup of AFR code<http://review.gluster.org/6010>
> glusterd: Volume locks and transaction specific opinfos<http://review.gluster.org/5994>
> gfapi: object handle based API extensions <http://review.gluster.org/5936>
> cli,glusterd: Changes to cli-glusterd communication<http://review.gluster.org/5280>
> client_t: phase 2, refactor server_ctx and locks_ctx out<http://review.gluster.org/5678>
> glusterd: glusterd changes to quota. <http://review.gluster.org/6003> (and
> dependent patches)
> features/qemu-block: add qemu backing image support (clone)<http://review.gluster.org/5967>
> cli: Introduce syncop in cli <http://review.gluster.org/4726>
> bd: Add support to create thin LV <http://review.gluster.org/5234> (and
> dependent patches)
> gfid-access: do chown() after creating the new entries<http://review.gluster.org/5833>
>
> Good to have :
>
> features/compress: Compression/DeCompression translator<http://review.gluster.org/3251>
> mgmt/glusterd: check whether quorum has been met from glusterd<http://review.gluster.org/5998>
> libglusterfs/inode: introduce new APIs for ctx handling<http://review.gluster.org/5890>
> cluster/dht - rebalance: handle the rebalance @ inode level (!fd level)<http://review.gluster.org/5891>
> protocol/server: do not do root-squashing for trusted clients<http://review.gluster.org/4863>
> rpc,glusterd: Use rpc_clnt notifyfn to cleanup mydata<http://review.gluster.org/5512>
>
>
> This may not be complete list. But would love to see patches listed here
> are considered.
>
> Regards,
> Amar
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Amar Tumballi <amarts at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> We are considering a 4 month release cycle for GlusterFS 3.5. The
>>> tentative dates are as under:
>>>
>>> 14th Aug, 2013 - Feature proposal freeze
>>>
>>> 4th Oct, 2013 - Feature freeze & Branching
>>>
>>>
>> Considering the Feature freeze date is approaching, it would be great if
>> developers wishing their features get it pushed up with reviewers (and not
>> just maintainers).
>>
>> Would be great if people rebase their patches so it shows up at the top
>> :-)
>>
>> -Amar
>>
>>
>>> 10th Oct, 2013 - Community Test Day1
>>>
>>> 29th Oct, 2013 - 3.5.0 Beta Release
>>>
>>> 31st Oct, 2013 - Community Test Day2
>>>
>>> 2nd Dec, 2013 - 3.5.0 GA
>>>
>>> The planning page for 3.5 is at [1]. New features can be proposed at
>>> [2]. After the proposal freeze, we can slot proposed projects into "core"
>>> and "nice to have" feature buckets in the planning page over an IRC meeting.
>>>
>>> Please do chime in with your thoughts on planning and propose features
>>> for addition to GlusterFS 3.5.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Vijay
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.gluster.org/**community/documentation/index.**
>>> php/Planning35<http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Planning35>
>>> [2] http://www.gluster.org/**community/documentation/index.**
>>> php/Planning35#Proposing_New_**Features<http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Planning35#Proposing_New_Features>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>> Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/**mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel<https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel>
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20131004/397dfc37/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list