[Gluster-devel] regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies
jdarcy at redhat.com
Thu Mar 28 19:43:48 UTC 2013
On 03/28/2013 02:49 PM, Anand Avati wrote:
> Yes, it should, based on the theory of how ext4 was generating the
> 63bits. But Jeff's test finds that the experiment is not matching the
FWIW, I was able to re-run my test in between stuff related to That
Other Problem. What seems to be happening is that we read correctly
until just after d_off 0x4000000000000000, then we suddenly wrap around
- not to the very first d_off we saw, but to a pretty early one (e.g.
0x0041b6340689a32e). This is all on a single brick, BTW, so it's pretty
easy to line up the back-end and front-end d_off values which match
perfectly up to this point.
I haven't had a chance to ponder what this all means and debug it
further. Hopefully I'll be able to do so soon, but I figured I'd
mention it in case something about those numbers rang a bell.
More information about the Gluster-devel