[Gluster-devel] Clone or re-open?

[Anand Avati]

Re-open the bug with a description of how it was misunderstood (copy-paste
your email).

Thanks,
Avati

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org> wrote:

>  Eco reported https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=763897,
> something I've been complaining about for some time and thought I'd also
> filed a bug on (but apparently I didn't). Pranith misunderstood the bug and
> closed it.
>
> The bug is about setting the first host's name from itself. The current
> method of setting the first host's name from the second seems like a
> horrible kludge and is a hindrance to automated installs.
>
> Attempting to set a server's own hostname through peer probe responds,
> "Probe on localhost not needed". There should be a way of doing this.
>
> So should I clone that and add my comments, or should somebody reopen it?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20130130/741a7a9a/attachment-0001.html>