[Gluster-devel] is it a bug? (unify+rr)
amar at gluster.com
Sat Aug 1 01:43:18 UTC 2009
'cluster/distribute' is just a symlink to 'cluster/dht', which works on
different design internally compared to 'cluster/unify' which needs a
centralized 'namespace' volume to work. We have noticed that the 'scaling'
is not possible with 'cluster/unify' and have decided to not continue any
more development on cluster/unify design, instead any more enhancement of
glusterfs will happen only on 'cluster/distribute' translator.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Yi Ling <lingyi.pro at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/8/1 Amar Tumballi <amar at gluster.com>
>> Any reason to go with 'cluster/unify' instead of 'cluster/distribute'?
>> Other than for 'switch' scheduler, we recommend 'cluster/distribute' for
>> combining the storage.
> so pls tell the difference between 'cluster/unify' and
> 'cluster/distribute' ?
> is 'cluster/unify' a essential translator on client?
> and the difference between 'cluster/distribute' and 'cluster/dht' ?
> so many similar translators that im very puzzled...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gluster-devel