[Gluster-devel] Re: Trying to setup afr 2 server 1 client following the example on the wiki

[Brandon Lamb]

On Jan 17, 2008 6:13 PM, Anand Avati <avati at zresearch.com> wrote:
> Brandon,
>  For the sake of diagnosing, can you try with these changes -
>
> 1. with a simple client and standalone server (no clustering anywhere)
> 2. remove unify in your setup. unify is not needed in this configuration.
> AFR on the client itself would be even better.
> 3. try removing write-behind.
>
> We're interested in knowing your results from those changes.
>
> avati
>
> 2008/1/17, Brandon Lamb < brandonlamb at gmail.com>:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 17, 2008 9:56 AM, Brandon Lamb < brandonlamb at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > http://ezopg.com/gfs/
> > >
> > > I uploaded my client config and the server configs for the 2 servers.
> > > 3 seperate machines.
> > >
> > > I can get to mounting, then do cd /mnt/gfs (mounted gfs dir) and then
> > > i typed find . -type f -exec head -c 1 {} \; >/dev/null and got
> > >
> > > find: ./test: Transport endpoint is not connected
> > > find: ./bak: Transport endpoint is not connected
> > >
> > > And then the crash on server1
> > >
> > > Am I doing someting obviously wrong?
> > >
> >
> > Ok I emptied the gfs and gfsns dirs on both servers (they had existing
> > files/dirs from a different gfs setup i was testing).
> >
> > Now I can create files and dirs.
> >
> > Now I am wondering about speed. I have a 82 megabyte tarball with 337
> files.
> > [root at client gfstest]# time tar xf yoda.tar
> > real    0m22.567s
> > user    0m0.042s
> > sys     0m0.357s
> >
> > Now i changed to a dir on server2 that i have mounted over nfs
> > [root at client nfstest]# time tar xf yoda.tar
> > real    0m4.956s
> > user    0m0.030s
> > sys     0m0.827s
> >
> > Do I have some performance translators configured wrong or in the
> > wrong place or is that really the speed I should be expecting?
> >
> > Server 1 is a 8 sata2 raid (8 seagate 250g es drives)
> > Server 2 is a 16 scsi 160 raid
> >
> > From roughly 5 seconds to 22 is a huge increase, Im hoping im doing
> > something horribly wrong. Using gigabit switch on its own 192 network
> > for all this
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
>
>
>
> --
> If I traveled to the end of the rainbow
> As Dame Fortune did intend,
> Murphy would be there to tell me
> The pot's at the other end.

Ok I will set this up in awhile and report back later tonight